Friday, October 28, 2011
Four Directions Walk to End Poverty
There is a lot of important information here put together by the folks in Winnipeg, Manitoba struggling against poverty. Lots of good ideas for activists in cities all across Canada and the United States. Some really good work going on here… Alan
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011
From: Four Directions Walk
Subject: Four Directions Walk Cte meeting – Tues, Nov 1
Four Direction Walk to End Poverty in Manitoba
Dear Friends, Sisters and Brothers,
Thank you everyone who attended, walked and helped out with this year’s 4DW last Saturday! We’ll be having a meeting to see how things went and make plans:
Four Directions Walk Committee
Tues, Nov. 1, 4:30 pm
St. Matthews Maryland Church
641 Maryland
(Use the South door on McGee)
Everyone is welcome.
Numbers, media, etc.
This was our largest annual Walk to date; more than 100 people participated including 10 Walkers from the perimeter with another 20 joining along the way.
A larger number of groups participated, swelling the numbers including Occupy Winnipeg, Action 1:21, FemRev Winnipeg, Feed My Lambs (thank you for the food!) and The Urban, among others. We want to thank all the groups that helped out, some of which are not listed here!
For the first time, we both major newspapers in Winnipeg covered the Walk. The articles are appended, below. Cheryl-Anne Carr, a Walk Committee member, is quoted accurately:
“The problems have been studied long enough, the situations have been looked at long enough, the problem is that there are not enough jobs, and the pay is not high enough. The problem is the province wants to keep people poor so that theres a huge pool of labour that’s frightened and can be used to keep wages down, and prices high. There’s a shortage of housing, theres a shortage of education spaces.”
Paul Graham with the help of Ken Harasym has produced a 30 minute video of the Walk, which will be broadcast repeatedly on Shaw Cable’s community channel: http://paulsgraham.ca/2011/10/24/video-four-directions-walk-to-end-poverty/
Many thanks! This is a must-see!
There is another video on youtube, but I don’t know who produced it:
It looks like we’ll have to have another Walk next year, because we had zero response from the government. We invited all elected politicians to listen, not speak). Only Harvey Smith from Winnipeg City Council attended (J Gerbasi and J Browaty sent their regrets they could not attend).
Of Winnipeg’s MPs, 3 Conservatives sent regrets (Fletcher, Toet and Bateman). Of MLAs, only one Progressive Conservative sent regrets (R Eichler, chair of the caucus).
If you have qs, we are at 792-3371 or reply by email.
Yours For Ending Poverty in Manitoba,
Four Directions Walk Committee
* * * * * *
Anti-poverty rally held at Legislature
By,Winnipeg Sun, Saturday, October 22, 2011
(81 internet comments omitted)
With flags waving and protest signs in the air, people marched from four directions of the city with one message eliminate poverty.
Protesters walked for hours before joining for a rally at the Manitoba Legislative Building Saturday afternoon.
“The problems have been studied long enough, the situations have been looked at long enough, the problem is that there are not enough jobs, and the pay is not high enough,” said Cheryl-Anne Carr, Four Directions Walk committee member.
“The problem is the province wants to keep people poor so that theres a huge pool of labour that’s frightened and can be used to keep wages down, and prices high. There’s a shortage of housing, theres a shortage of education spaces.”
The event marked the fourth annual Four Directions Walk to End Poverty. Clothing and food donations were being taken at the rally for the less fortunate.
Protester Terry Weaymouth said he hopes the protest will open people’s eyes to Winnipeg’s poverty problems.
“I think everybody’s affected by poverty, especially in my life,” he said. “I grew up in poverty and my friends have been affected by poverty. Its a big issue.”
Shon Villier held up a sign that read Solidarity in different languages.
“We don’t have to live in a society where people are hungry and living in the streets,” Villier said. “We have the resources to share, we have the money and it doesn’t have to be this way.”
Politics blamed for plight of poor
Marchers rally at legislature
By: Alexandra Paul, Winnipeg Free Press, Sunday, October 23, 2011
(72 internet comments omitted)
Under grey skies, about 50 people with banners and placards that called for an end to poverty rallied on the steps of the Manitoba legislature Saturday.
The fourth annual Four Directions Walk to End Poverty saw groups of a dozen or more gather at each of the four cardinal points of the Perimeter Highway and walk through the city to meet at the government seat.
“I came all the way from the Perimeter at Headingley,” said Neil Adams, a community worker from the North End. “I told people on the way here, who were honking their horns on Portage Avenue, to honk for better housing, better water and more wages.”
The annual event draws together a coalition of anti-poverty groups that believe it is a lack of political will that keeps welfare rates low and the working poor dependent on food banks.
“The problem is the government wants to keep people poor so they’ll have a pool of cheap labour,” organizer Cheryl Ann Carr said.
“We’ve talked to hundreds of people and put together a justice charter, and we can eliminate poverty in this province and we can do it quickly,” Carr said.
The charter is a six-point plan that calls for housing, expanded health care, jobs and annual incomes to be human rights. It also calls for an end to racism, sexism and all forms of discrimination. The sixth demand is for proportional government and pay cuts to match the average workers wage and benefits for all MLAs.
The Lutheran Urban Ministry collected sweaters, coats, shoes and boots to distribute at the rally.
Another group was handing out food next to a sign that read, Feed My Lambs.
Walkers began at St. Mary’s Road and the Perimeter in the south, Portage Avenue at the Perimeter in the west, Main Street at the Perimeter in the north and Pembina Highway at the Perimeter in the south.
“The major problem we face in this city and in this province is poverty… What it requires is for some level of government action to do something about it,” Coun. Harvey Smith (Daniel McIntyre) said.
He pointed to municipal housing programs in cities like Calgary that could be adopted in Winnipeg to cut the rate of homelessness.
Longtime poverty advocate Nick Ternette said he puts the blame for a lack of political will squarely on the shoulders of the provincial government.
“The NDP has paid no attention to poverty issues in an effective way. During the election campaign, I asked one cabinet minister (if he supported) a guaranteed annual income and he said No. A single person on social assistance gets $481 a month; thats $4 a day for food. It hasn’t increased in over a decade,” Ternette said.
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Should an occupation of the Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant be considered to save it?
Eighty-six years of government subsidies in St. Paul and Ford packs up and moves its Ranger operation to Thailand:
http://www.twincities.com/ci_19134908?IADID=Search-www.twinc ities.com-www.twincities.com www.twincities.comFORD MOTOR CO.: EIGHTY-SIX YEARS IN ST. PAULFord Motor Company announces its Christmas present for workers and the Twin Cities:
http://www.twincities.com/ci_19132527?IADID=Search-www.twinc ities.com-www.twincities.com www.twincities.comWorkers at the Ford Motor Co. plant in St. Paul got the word Monday: The 86-year-old facility will close Dec. 19.
Monday, October 10, 2011
Occupy Wall Street: The Most Important Thing in the World Now
Note: Naomi Klein could have strengthened her remarks tremendously by pointing out the need for the creation of a third party alternative to Wall Street's agenda and the historic third consecutive victory of the Manitoba New Democratic Party in forming another NDP majority government as an example we should be striving for.
Naomi Klein could have further strengthened her remarks by suggestion of a couple concrete suggestions for the kind of reforms needed to solve this crisis-of-everyday-living working people are now confronted with as working people are now living from problem-to-problem with diminishing pay checks as austerity measures are being forced down our throats to pay for Wall Street's imperialist wars.
Naomi Klein could have further strengthened her remarks by suggestion of a couple concrete suggestions for the kind of reforms needed to solve this crisis-of-everyday-living working people are now confronted with as working people are now living from problem-to-problem with diminishing pay checks as austerity measures are being forced down our throats to pay for Wall Street's imperialist wars.
All things considered, this is a refreshing statement from a left-leaning, populist Canadian social democrat.
Alan L. Maki
Published on Friday, October 7, 2011 by The Occupied Wall Street Journal
Occupy Wall Street: The Most Important Thing in the World Now
by Naomi Klein
I was honored to be invited to speak at Occupy Wall Street on Thursday night. Since amplification is (disgracefully) banned, and everything I say will have to be repeated by hundreds of people so others can hear (a k a “the human microphone”), what I actually say at Liberty Plaza will have to be very short. With that in mind, here is the longer, uncut version of the speech.
I love you.
And I didn’t just say that so that hundreds of you would shout “I love you” back, though that is obviously a bonus feature of the human microphone. Say unto others what you would have them say unto you, only way louder.
Yesterday, one of the speakers at the labor rally said: “We found each other.” That sentiment captures the beauty of what is being created here. A wide-open space (as well as an idea so big it can’t be contained by any space) for all the people who want a better world to find each other. We are so grateful.
If there is one thing I know, it is that the 1 percent loves a crisis. When people are panicked and desperate and no one seems to know what to do, that is the ideal time to push through their wish list of pro-corporate policies: privatizing education and social security, slashing public services, getting rid of the last constraints on corporate power. Amidst the economic crisis, this is happening the world over.
And there is only one thing that can block this tactic, and fortunately, it’s a very big thing: the 99 percent. And that 99 percent is taking to the streets from Madison to Madrid to say “No. We will not pay for your crisis.”
That slogan began in Italy in 2008. It ricocheted to Greece and France and Ireland and finally it has made its way to the square mile where the crisis began.
“Why are they protesting?” ask the baffled pundits on TV. Meanwhile, the rest of the world asks: “What took you so long?” “We’ve been wondering when you were going to show up.” And most of all: “Welcome.”
Many people have drawn parallels between Occupy Wall Street and the so-called anti-globalization protests that came to world attention in Seattle in 1999. That was the last time a global, youth-led, decentralized movement took direct aim at corporate power. And I am proud to have been part of what we called “the movement of movements.”
But there are important differences too. For instance, we chose summits as our targets: the World Trade Organization, the International Monetary Fund, the G8. Summits are transient by their nature, they only last a week. That made us transient too. We’d appear, grab world headlines, then disappear. And in the frenzy of hyper patriotism and militarism that followed the 9/11 attacks, it was easy to sweep us away completely, at least in North America.
Occupy Wall Street, on the other hand, has chosen a fixed target. And you have put no end date on your presence here. This is wise. Only when you stay put can you grow roots. This is crucial. It is a fact of the information age that too many movements spring up like beautiful flowers but quickly die off. It’s because they don’t have roots. And they don’t have long term plans for how they are going to sustain themselves. So when storms come, they get washed away.
I love you.
And I didn’t just say that so that hundreds of you would shout “I love you” back, though that is obviously a bonus feature of the human microphone. Say unto others what you would have them say unto you, only way louder.
Yesterday, one of the speakers at the labor rally said: “We found each other.” That sentiment captures the beauty of what is being created here. A wide-open space (as well as an idea so big it can’t be contained by any space) for all the people who want a better world to find each other. We are so grateful.
If there is one thing I know, it is that the 1 percent loves a crisis. When people are panicked and desperate and no one seems to know what to do, that is the ideal time to push through their wish list of pro-corporate policies: privatizing education and social security, slashing public services, getting rid of the last constraints on corporate power. Amidst the economic crisis, this is happening the world over.
And there is only one thing that can block this tactic, and fortunately, it’s a very big thing: the 99 percent. And that 99 percent is taking to the streets from Madison to Madrid to say “No. We will not pay for your crisis.”
That slogan began in Italy in 2008. It ricocheted to Greece and France and Ireland and finally it has made its way to the square mile where the crisis began.
“Why are they protesting?” ask the baffled pundits on TV. Meanwhile, the rest of the world asks: “What took you so long?” “We’ve been wondering when you were going to show up.” And most of all: “Welcome.”
Many people have drawn parallels between Occupy Wall Street and the so-called anti-globalization protests that came to world attention in Seattle in 1999. That was the last time a global, youth-led, decentralized movement took direct aim at corporate power. And I am proud to have been part of what we called “the movement of movements.”
But there are important differences too. For instance, we chose summits as our targets: the World Trade Organization, the International Monetary Fund, the G8. Summits are transient by their nature, they only last a week. That made us transient too. We’d appear, grab world headlines, then disappear. And in the frenzy of hyper patriotism and militarism that followed the 9/11 attacks, it was easy to sweep us away completely, at least in North America.
Occupy Wall Street, on the other hand, has chosen a fixed target. And you have put no end date on your presence here. This is wise. Only when you stay put can you grow roots. This is crucial. It is a fact of the information age that too many movements spring up like beautiful flowers but quickly die off. It’s because they don’t have roots. And they don’t have long term plans for how they are going to sustain themselves. So when storms come, they get washed away.
Something else this movement is doing right: You have committed yourselves to non-violence. You have refused to give the media the images of broken windows and street fights it craves so desperately. And that tremendous discipline has meant that, again and again, the story has been the disgraceful and unprovoked police brutality. Which we saw more of just last night. Meanwhile, support for this movement grows and grows. More wisdom.
But the biggest difference a decade makes is that in 1999, we were taking on capitalism at the peak of a frenzied economic boom. Unemployment was low, stock portfolios were bulging. The media was drunk on easy money. Back then it was all about start-ups, not shutdowns.
We pointed out that the deregulation behind the frenzy came at a price. It was damaging to labor standards. It was damaging to environmental standards. Corporations were becoming more powerful than governments and that was damaging to our democracies. But to be honest with you, while the good times rolled, taking on an economic system based on greed was a tough sell, at least in rich countries.
Ten years later, it seems as if there aren’t any more rich countries. Just a whole lot of rich people. People who got rich looting the public wealth and exhausting natural resources around the world.
The point is, today everyone can see that the system is deeply unjust and careening out of control. Unfettered greed has trashed the global economy. And it is trashing the natural world as well. We are overfishing our oceans, polluting our water with fracking and deepwater drilling, turning to the dirtiest forms of energy on the planet, like the Alberta tar sands. And the atmosphere cannot absorb the amount of carbon we are putting into it, creating dangerous warming. The new normal is serial disasters: economic and ecological.
These are the facts on the ground. They are so blatant, so obvious, that it is a lot easier to connect with the public than it was in 1999, and to build the movement quickly.
We all know, or at least sense, that the world is upside down: we act as if there is no end to what is actually finite—fossil fuels and the atmospheric space to absorb their emissions. And we act as if there are strict and immovable limits to what is actually bountiful—the financial resources to build the kind of society we need.
The task of our time is to turn this around: to challenge this false scarcity. To insist that we can afford to build a decent, inclusive society—while at the same time, respect the real limits to what the earth can take.
What climate change means is that we have to do this on a deadline. This time our movement cannot get distracted, divided, burned out or swept away by events. This time we have to succeed. And I’m not talking about regulating the banks and increasing taxes on the rich, though that’s important.
I am talking about changing the underlying values that govern our society. That is hard to fit into a single media-friendly demand, and it’s also hard to figure out how to do it. But it is no less urgent for being difficult.
That is what I see happening in this square. In the way you are feeding each other, keeping each other warm, sharing information freely and proving health care, meditation classes and empowerment training. My favorite sign here says, “I care about you.” In a culture that trains people to avoid each other’s gaze, to say, “Let them die,” that is a deeply radical statement.
A few final thoughts. In this great struggle, here are some things that don’t matter.
§ What we wear.
§ Whether we shake our fists or make peace signs.
§ Whether we can fit our dreams for a better world into a media soundbite.
And here are a few things that do matter.
§ Our courage.
§ Our moral compass.
§ How we treat each other.
We have picked a fight with the most powerful economic and political forces on the planet. That’s frightening. And as this movement grows from strength to strength, it will get more frightening. Always be aware that there will be a temptation to shift to smaller targets—like, say, the person sitting next to you at this meeting. After all, that is a battle that’s easier to win.
Don’t give in to the temptation. I’m not saying don’t call each other on shit. But this time, let’s treat each other as if we plan to work side by side in struggle for many, many years to come. Because the task before will demand nothing less.
Let’s treat this beautiful movement as if it is most important thing in the world. Because it is. It really is.
But the biggest difference a decade makes is that in 1999, we were taking on capitalism at the peak of a frenzied economic boom. Unemployment was low, stock portfolios were bulging. The media was drunk on easy money. Back then it was all about start-ups, not shutdowns.
We pointed out that the deregulation behind the frenzy came at a price. It was damaging to labor standards. It was damaging to environmental standards. Corporations were becoming more powerful than governments and that was damaging to our democracies. But to be honest with you, while the good times rolled, taking on an economic system based on greed was a tough sell, at least in rich countries.
Ten years later, it seems as if there aren’t any more rich countries. Just a whole lot of rich people. People who got rich looting the public wealth and exhausting natural resources around the world.
The point is, today everyone can see that the system is deeply unjust and careening out of control. Unfettered greed has trashed the global economy. And it is trashing the natural world as well. We are overfishing our oceans, polluting our water with fracking and deepwater drilling, turning to the dirtiest forms of energy on the planet, like the Alberta tar sands. And the atmosphere cannot absorb the amount of carbon we are putting into it, creating dangerous warming. The new normal is serial disasters: economic and ecological.
These are the facts on the ground. They are so blatant, so obvious, that it is a lot easier to connect with the public than it was in 1999, and to build the movement quickly.
We all know, or at least sense, that the world is upside down: we act as if there is no end to what is actually finite—fossil fuels and the atmospheric space to absorb their emissions. And we act as if there are strict and immovable limits to what is actually bountiful—the financial resources to build the kind of society we need.
The task of our time is to turn this around: to challenge this false scarcity. To insist that we can afford to build a decent, inclusive society—while at the same time, respect the real limits to what the earth can take.
What climate change means is that we have to do this on a deadline. This time our movement cannot get distracted, divided, burned out or swept away by events. This time we have to succeed. And I’m not talking about regulating the banks and increasing taxes on the rich, though that’s important.
I am talking about changing the underlying values that govern our society. That is hard to fit into a single media-friendly demand, and it’s also hard to figure out how to do it. But it is no less urgent for being difficult.
That is what I see happening in this square. In the way you are feeding each other, keeping each other warm, sharing information freely and proving health care, meditation classes and empowerment training. My favorite sign here says, “I care about you.” In a culture that trains people to avoid each other’s gaze, to say, “Let them die,” that is a deeply radical statement.
A few final thoughts. In this great struggle, here are some things that don’t matter.
§ What we wear.
§ Whether we shake our fists or make peace signs.
§ Whether we can fit our dreams for a better world into a media soundbite.
And here are a few things that do matter.
§ Our courage.
§ Our moral compass.
§ How we treat each other.
We have picked a fight with the most powerful economic and political forces on the planet. That’s frightening. And as this movement grows from strength to strength, it will get more frightening. Always be aware that there will be a temptation to shift to smaller targets—like, say, the person sitting next to you at this meeting. After all, that is a battle that’s easier to win.
Don’t give in to the temptation. I’m not saying don’t call each other on shit. But this time, let’s treat each other as if we plan to work side by side in struggle for many, many years to come. Because the task before will demand nothing less.
Let’s treat this beautiful movement as if it is most important thing in the world. Because it is. It really is.
Copyright © 2011 Naomi Klein
Sunday, October 9, 2011
The ghost of Joe McCarthy is alive and well in the MNDFL
Was in downtown Minneapolis yesterday on Nicollet Mall. Saw a handful of protesters on the corner of 8th Street. Apparently there are going to be more as time goes on.
You say you want a revolution.. but want to fore-go reforms; dialog with a one of the leaders of the "leaderless" Occupy Wall Street movement
In my opinion, it is strange to first talk about occupying Wall Street then occupying a park near Wall Street and then not talking about the need to occupy the mines, mills and factories that the Wall Street coupon clippers own.
Are we talking about building a movement capable of challenging Wall Street for power or are we simply talking about creating a militant looking front that plays well for Barack Obama's re-birthed and perverted sense of populism aimed at getting himself re-elected so he can kick us under the bus as he continues to carry out Wall Streets thoroughly reactionary Wall Street agenda of more wars abroad paid for through austerity measures imposed on the working class here at home.
Here we go again with a new New Left agenda under the guise of "occupy everything" as long as it's a public square or public park; when what we need is to re-build the historic popular front of working class liberals, progressives and leftists fighting and struggling for real change as we prepare the ground to put and end to capitalism and bring forward the socialist alternative.
What the moment requires is a strong anti-capitalist, anti-monopoly coalition--- recognizing the parasitical exploiters, profiteers and warmongers of Wall Street as our enemy--- struggling in the streets, in our communities, in our schools and in our places of employment backed up by a progressive people's party carrying forward an anti-monopoly agenda aimed at taking political and economic power out of the hands of Wall Street coupon clippers.
Alan L. Maki
« Try And Catch The Wind
Occupy Wall Street: Defining The Undefinable
By: LUCKYMW
Saturday October 8, 2011 12:48 am

"Occupy Everything" (Photo: Yung GrassHopper)
Occupy Wall Street is about revolution, not reforms.
The movement is about creating a democracy based on mutual respect, compassion, and looking out for each other’s best interests.
It is all-inclusive to people of any political party and all voices are welcome to the debate as to how to replace the existing corporate/government co-dependency which results in 99% of the people being excluded from the opportunity to succeed on a level playing field.
We have a list of grievances that was generated by Occupy Wall Street in NY, and those issues are all on the table for discussion in a democratic fashion in order to create solutions.
We have only a horizontal hierarchy to prevent one person’s agenda from skewing the needs of the group.
This is not a political movement, it’s a social movement in which we are now first getting to know one another while we’re beginning a national conversation to rectify the position we’ve been put in by the monolithic Wall Street machine that has purchased our representative government.
We are aware that this movement will take time to grow and for that conversation to synthesize the specific changes we democratically choose to take effect.
We are committed to no set timetable, we’re here for as long as it takes and for as long as people stay unified in this shared vision.
Right now we are engaging in direct non-violent action so that we can show our sense of strength and purpose in order to attract more voices to the conversation.
This is not an anti-capitalist campaign, nor do we seek to destroy capitalist institutions.
The goal is to create a new paradigm in which we all enjoy the promises made to us in the Constitution, not just the crumbs left to us by the privileged class.
We are only seeking to benefit from our labors and protect our rights to liberty, health, education, and the pursuit of shared prosperity.
My response---
Alan Maki
October 9th, 2011 at 6:09 am «
LUCKYMW,
Could you post the complete “list of grievances” you have referred to?
I travel quite widely and often through the Great Lakes Region talking to working people about their problems and the solutions to these problems.
You talk about “occupying” everything. Shouldn’t we be concerned with “occupying” public offices with politicians who will advance an alternative to Wall Street’s agenda of imperialist wars abroad paid for through austerity measures here at home?
I find it interesting you unequivocally state that this is NOT an anti-capitalist movement and on the other hand you claim this is a revolutionary movement and not about reforms.
You say you are prepared to occupy for as long as it takes. Fine. But, can people being evicted from their homes wait that long? Can people who are unemployed “wait” for a job until your, as so far claimed but not stated “list of grievances” are addressed and resolved?
By the way, I really have to wonder what kind of “grievances” you have if these “grievances” don’t include reforms aimed at solving the problems working people are experiencing.
Quite frankly, what you have written here demonstrates that you don’t understand the relationship between reforms and revolution nor do you seem to understand that working people need a political party to advance their agenda relating to what they struggle and fight for in the streets, in their communities and at work.
You talk about “occupying everything” but I don’t see any suggestions that closing mines, mills or plants be “occupied” to prevent lockouts in labor disputes nor when mines, mills and plants are designated to be closed while Wall Street ships the jobs to low-cost labor areas overseas.
Wall Street’s Ford Motor Company has determined— without community and worker participation— that it will close the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant here in St. Paul, Minnesota later this year as it has begun production of the Ford Ranger in Thailand. Has Occupy Wall Street discussed occupying this plant to save it from the wrecking ball to make way for a housing project that only the well-heeled Wall Street coupon clippers will be able to afford?
I think it is quite clear this Occupy Wall Street movement has all the traits and earmarks of an anarchist operation the Obama supporting trade union leadership just loves to promote to “prove” its militancy as it tries to shove Wall Street’s Obama down our throats for a second shafting.
I find it interesting that a movement claiming to be in opposition to Wall Street hasn’t mouthed one single word in opposition to Wall Street’s hand picked and financed president without so much as asking the American people the question: How is Barack Obama’s Wall Street war economy working for you?
How interesting you call for broader participation in the decision-making process by the people but fail to acknowledge that Wall Street manipulates and controls us to their profit seeking, profit gouging end through the control they have in the corporate boardrooms and through its control of our public institutions including local, state and national public office.
I don’t think you know what the hell you want.
Most people in this country do see Wall Street as their enemy. Most people— working people— have a pretty good idea of the kind of country they want even if you don’t want to acknowledge what most Americans want because it doesn’t fit in with your stated ideas of “revolution without reforms.”
I do know what most people in this country want. And I challenge you or anyone else to prove me wrong. In fact, I challenge you to place this before your “General Assembly” for discussion to see what people have to say. This is nothing more than what I have written down in my notes from talking to people in their homes, at work, in grocery stores and at gas stations. Place it before the “General Assembly” for discussion to see if people agree:
A people’s program for real change…
* Peace— end the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya and shutdown the 800 U.S. military bases on foreign soil protecting Wall Street’s interests.
* A National Public Health Care System – ten million new jobs; free health care for all.
* A National Public Child Care System – three to five million new jobs; free child care for all working families.
* Works Progress Administration – three million new jobs; repair, restore and build new infrastructure.
* Civilian Conservation Corps – two million new jobs protecting and restoring to health our ecosystems.
* Public Ownership of the 58,000 mines, mills and factories closed by Wall Street – twenty-five million good paying, decent union jobs.
* Tax the hell out of the rich and cut the military budget by ending the wars to pay for it all which will create full employment.
* Enforce Affirmative Action; end discrimination.
* Raise the minimum wage to a real living wage.
* What tax-payers subsidize in the way of businesses, tax-payers should own and reap the profits from.
* Moratorium on home foreclosures and evictions.
* Defend democracy by defending workers’ rights including the right to collective bargaining for improving the lives and livelihoods of working people.
* Roll-back and freeze the price of food, electricity, gas and heating fuels; not wages, benefits or pensions.
* Defend and expand Social Security.
* Wall Street is our enemy.
Let’s talk about the politics and economics of livelihood for a real change.
The time has come for working people to break free from Wall Street’s “two-party trap.” We need a working class-based progressive people’s party.
Peace + tax the rich = millions of new jobs at real living wages putting people to work solving our social problems which will solve our economic problems… Redistribute the wealth. Put people before Wall Street profits.
How is Barack Obama’s Wall Street war economy working for you?
Friday, October 7, 2011
An exchange on FireDogLake
My complete post and all comments can be found here:
http://my.firedoglake.com/alanmaki/2011/10/06/have-progressives-missed-the-most-important-political-news-this-week/#comment-419
Kurt,
The socialist, labor-based New Democratic Party's electoral victory in Manitoba is not only good news; it is very big news because this is a working class victory over over both Bay Street and Wall Street achieved in opposition to some of the largest multi-national corporations in mining, manufacturing, big-agribusiness, the forestry industry, the banking and telecommunications industries--- and most important of all, this important victory stymied and thwarted the attempt by Bay Street's and Wall Street's parasitical coupon clippers to get their greedy hands on Manitoba's huge publicly owned power generating industry like they did with Manitoba's modern provincially owned and operated telecommunications industry when the Bay Street and Wall Street backed Conservatives gave away it all away to these ravenous and greedy vultures.
This fourth consecutive victory for Manitobans comes at a time when the G-8/G-20 are trying to gain a choke-hold over all humanity and the fact that Manitobans are holding firm in opposition to Bay Street and Wall Street at this time as an example of how working people can stand up to these bastards makes this electoral victory placing Manitobans squarely in the forefront of international working class struggles makes this very big news.
Manitoba farmers, through their support for the NDP, are standing up in defense of the Canadian Wheat Board which has been a thorn in the side of the big grain cartels including the huge U.S. multi-nationals like Archer-Daniels-Midland and Cargill.
In choosing the NDP, workers at the huge nickle mining operation in Thompson, Manitoba have voted to save the refinery and hundreds of jobs as Vale/INCO tries to shut down the operation.
Manitoba's working class and farmers have done what workers everywhere need to do: back up their struggles in the workplace and in the streets by electing politicians from among their ranks to lead their government through these very troubling and difficult times.
Show me another local, state/provincial or federal government in North America that better reflects and represents the needs of working people and I will agree with you that this "is good news but hardly big news."
Manitoba's working class is not occupying a public square or public park--- Manitoba's working class dominates and controls the provincial government. It is time for workers everywhere to take a lesson from Manitoba's working class if we are going to be able to not only "Occupy Wall Street" but take it over and nationalize it by bringing the multi-nationals under public ownership so the wealth can be re-distributed as required.
The electoral victory of the NDP further provides us with proof of what the working class can achieve when it has real leaders; something the "leaderless" Occupy Wall Street movement might want to consider very closely lest it be hood-winked and hi-jacked by a bunch of worthless Wall Street backed politicians like Barack Obama and Ron Paul.
I understand why the Wall Street owned MainStreamMedia wants to ignore this most important electoral victory of the NDP in Manitoba; but, why has our alternative media from The Real News to Democracy Now to FireDogLake to the many left-wing newspapers and progressive blogs ignored this good news and important news story, too?
http://my.firedoglake.com/alanmaki/2011/10/06/have-progressives-missed-the-most-important-political-news-this-week/#comment-419
Kurt,
The socialist, labor-based New Democratic Party's electoral victory in Manitoba is not only good news; it is very big news because this is a working class victory over over both Bay Street and Wall Street achieved in opposition to some of the largest multi-national corporations in mining, manufacturing, big-agribusiness, the forestry industry, the banking and telecommunications industries--- and most important of all, this important victory stymied and thwarted the attempt by Bay Street's and Wall Street's parasitical coupon clippers to get their greedy hands on Manitoba's huge publicly owned power generating industry like they did with Manitoba's modern provincially owned and operated telecommunications industry when the Bay Street and Wall Street backed Conservatives gave away it all away to these ravenous and greedy vultures.
This fourth consecutive victory for Manitobans comes at a time when the G-8/G-20 are trying to gain a choke-hold over all humanity and the fact that Manitobans are holding firm in opposition to Bay Street and Wall Street at this time as an example of how working people can stand up to these bastards makes this electoral victory placing Manitobans squarely in the forefront of international working class struggles makes this very big news.
Manitoba farmers, through their support for the NDP, are standing up in defense of the Canadian Wheat Board which has been a thorn in the side of the big grain cartels including the huge U.S. multi-nationals like Archer-Daniels-Midland and Cargill.
In choosing the NDP, workers at the huge nickle mining operation in Thompson, Manitoba have voted to save the refinery and hundreds of jobs as Vale/INCO tries to shut down the operation.
Manitoba's working class and farmers have done what workers everywhere need to do: back up their struggles in the workplace and in the streets by electing politicians from among their ranks to lead their government through these very troubling and difficult times.
Show me another local, state/provincial or federal government in North America that better reflects and represents the needs of working people and I will agree with you that this "is good news but hardly big news."
Manitoba's working class is not occupying a public square or public park--- Manitoba's working class dominates and controls the provincial government. It is time for workers everywhere to take a lesson from Manitoba's working class if we are going to be able to not only "Occupy Wall Street" but take it over and nationalize it by bringing the multi-nationals under public ownership so the wealth can be re-distributed as required.
The electoral victory of the NDP further provides us with proof of what the working class can achieve when it has real leaders; something the "leaderless" Occupy Wall Street movement might want to consider very closely lest it be hood-winked and hi-jacked by a bunch of worthless Wall Street backed politicians like Barack Obama and Ron Paul.
I understand why the Wall Street owned MainStreamMedia wants to ignore this most important electoral victory of the NDP in Manitoba; but, why has our alternative media from The Real News to Democracy Now to FireDogLake to the many left-wing newspapers and progressive blogs ignored this good news and important news story, too?
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)