There is lots of controversy that continues to swirl around Angela Davis' support for Barack Obama.
You know, I couldn't care less who Angela Davis supports for president;
what really irks me is that some people think there are certain
people's opinions that are taboo for discussion--- at least if there is
anything critical being said. It just so happens that the same people
who want to drown out a discussion on
what Angela Davis has had to say about Obama are the very same people
who tried to prevent a discussion about Obama and what he represents.
Why would anyone be anointed with some kind of status that no matter
what they say there should be no discussion? This is perpetrating the
worst kind of arrogance which can only stifle and block movement
building.
I just posted this as a comment under a facebook post where this is being discussed, again:
Angela Davis' main concern is on the prison reform issue. What I don't
understand is when she is out campaigning in support of Obama and
defending Obama's "progressive proclivities" is why she never talks
about Obama in relation to the prison reform issue. Does Obama have any
"progressive proclivities" when it comes to prison reform or reforming
the racist system of justice--- or more appropriately as we should label
the entire system all across this country as one of "in-justice?"
The entire "judicial" system and "justice" system has been turned into
nothing but a racket from the first phone call you are allowed to make
once arrested that is likely to cost you $3.00 a minute to being charged
"booking fees" and "room and board fees" from the time you are first
arrested to enormous fees for using your credit card for bail--- and
this is just the beginning of what has been transformed into one big
profit-gouging racket.
What has Obama and his Department of Justice done to bring an end to any of these injustices? Nothing.
Leonard Peltier remains behind bars when one of his first acts being elected should have been to let him out of prison.
Barack Obama has refused to enforce Affirmative Action pursuant to Federal Executive Order # 11246.
In fact, Barack Obama has been carrying out Wall Street's agenda which is thoroughly racist and reactionary.
Angela Davis in her last speech in Detroit just before the election
supported Obama and chastised progressives for not building the
movements required to do what is right by the people.
Obama
does okay on his own doing right by Wall Street; how come he, with these
"progressive proclivities," needs a push from the people to do what is
right by the people?
But, even more to the point, who ever
heard of building up the very politician you are going to end up having
to fight for what is right and just?
Angela Davis talks about "movement building" yet where is her leadership in helping to build these movements.
Obama has not delivered on one single issue on the progressive agenda--- not one.
After the election Angela Davis delivered a speech in New York City heralding Obama's victory.
The problem is, her speech before the Left Labor Project, was promoted
as "Where do we go from here?" and she never broached that topic except
in a in the most superficial way without any specifics.
There
was one banner behind her calling for jobs to be created by taxing the
rich--- nothing on the banner about full employment or how Obama's wars
are killing jobs just like they kill people.
I don't know how
anyone calling themselves progressive or left can tolerate Obama because
he has some kind of "progressive proclivities" and then castigate the
rest of us for not being engaged in "movement building."
The
fact is; if Angela Davis was engaged in the kind of movement building
which won her freedom; she wouldn't even be invited to speak in front of
these audiences organized by the Democrats and their coalition partners
calling themselves "progressives for Obama."
If you don't
believe me, just try to get the floor at any Democratic Party function
from precinct caucus, to county or state conventions--- never mind
trying to get a issue like single payer to the floor of a national
Democratic Party convention.
Would Angela Davis ever be allowed
the courtesy of speaking about prison reform before a national
Democratic Party convention? No.
She wouldn't even be extended
the courtesy of speaking before the Michigan or New York Democratic
Party State Conventions. Yet Democrats in both New York and Detroit
turned out people to hear her speak about supporting Barack Obama but
she never asked the most important question of all:
What about the government's responsibility for full employment?
Why not? There is an issue a huge movement can be built around.
Just try asking Barack Obama to re-submit the Full Employment Act of 1945 which Democrats defeated to Congress.
After all, isn't everyone having a job paying a real living wage the real key to "prison reform?"
Just think; if we built a grassroots movement making the government
shoulder its responsibility for full employment like the movement which
freed Angela Davis we would be building the kind of heat required to
make Obama and all these other politicians accountable to the people.
i listened to both of Angela Davis' speeches pre-election (Detroit) and
post-election (New York); she never so much as asked people to sign a
petition to Obama reflecting the progressive agenda opposed to these
dirty Wall Street imperialist wars which kill jobs just like they kill
people thus subjecting people to the kind of racist and criminal poverty
which is a breeding ground for crime.
No comments:
Post a Comment