We need to beat swords into plowshares.

We need to beat swords into plowshares.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

The Indian Gaming Industry a creation of the Democratic Party

A response to a member of an AFL-CIO affiliated union...

We are fighting every day for what is right. Provable? What I say is so blatant it embarrasses Richard Trumka to even think about the plight of workers employed in the Indian Gaming Industry... I have all kinds of documentation. I will be happy to make a presentation to the AFL-CIO Executive Board any time... I speak to union locals all over the Midwest about the plight of casino workers. Beginning on Labor Day 2011 I will be touring through Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, Illinois, Ohio and Pennsylvania talking about the plight of casino workers in the Indian Gaming Industry and how our plight is a symptom of the problems in the Democratic Party and the labor movement and the problems we are fighting to solve that will benefit the entire working class--- and why we need to dump Obama. Some people in the labor movement whose members have been tossed a few scraps and bones from Obama don't like to hear me say this; but, consider our position... we are getting nothing but shit. And since you haven't itemized one single thing you have gotten out of Obama and the Democratic Party I assume you and your members have gotten a pile of shit, too.

Furthermore, if you doubt anything I say, it is up to you to prove me wrong. I have a lot of things posted on my blogs about the plight of casino workers and the betrayal of the Democratic Party and the AFL-CIO... you see, I don't need lectures about what to do or how to do it; the very fact that people from all over read what I post on here, on my blogs, listen to what I say in union halls and church basements and sitting in living rooms and around kitchen tables and more and more people are listening. And the more people listen the greater the embarrassment becomes for the AFL-CIO and the Democratic Party.

Here are the facts; what more do I need to prove?

Two million American workers are employed in the Indian Gaming Industry at over 350 casinos, hotels/motels, convention centers, restaurants and theme parks working in loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos at poverty wages without any rights under state or federal labor laws because the Democratic Party, with the full knowledge and complicity of the AFL-CIO whose many affiliates have their pension funds invested in these casinos--- notably the Teamsters (CTW) and the Teacher Union Pension Funds and the Building Trades Unions have worked out sweetheart agreements with these mobsters for their members to be employed constructing these casinos BUT their members aren't even protected by written contracts and business managers, business agents and union stewards are not even allowed on these job sites which are not even policed by OSHA or any of its state bodies where state building and fire inspectors are not permitted on the construction sites. By the way, the United States Department of Labor refuses to even enforce things so basic as wages and hours.

Employers have been responsible for creating some terrible working conditions in this country but never before has a political party been so involved in seeing to it that government is used to actually create these conditions as is the case with the Indian Gaming Industry that was established through "Compacts" intentionally drafted and designed to create this most horrendous situation... try working in one of these loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos for a few months and then let's see if you doubt what I am telling you.

You wouldn't send your children to work at a Burger King or McDonalds under these conditions and yet the Democratic Party with full complicity of the AFL-CIO sends two-million Americans to work under these conditions: Why? Because the Democratic Party is reaping hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions from these casino managements every election cycle.

Certainly you understand that workers without a voice at work and without any rights at work have no rights in the communities they live in because the first time they open their mouths about what is going on they get fired.

Workers employed in this Indian Gaming Industry are forced to sign statements as a condition of their employment that they understand they will be fired if they participate in any union organizing activity... blatantly illegal in any other industry here in the United States... and against all international labor covenants and standards.

Richard Trumka is worried about the plight of workers in China but he has lifted a finger or opened his big, fat mouth about the plight of casino workers forced to work in this great bastion of democracy under these conditions.

Some politicians and "labor leaders" complain that nothing is being done about this situation because of the manner I have raised this issue--- well, I ask them why they allowed this to develop in the first place then they wouldn't have to listen to me--- and, there is nothing stopping Richard Trumka from insisting that these "Compacts" be opened to include full protections extended to all other workers employed in the Indian Gaming Industry.

Monday, December 6, 2010

Richard Trumka claims to be doing something about unemployment--- ya, sure; you betcha

 I am quite aware of what you say... my concern is not about the history of this alliance; my concern is what is this alliance being talked about here going to do other than holding another press conference or two or three... Martin Luther King led massive protests movements in the streets; sit ins, bus boycotts... besides operating a few soup kitchens-- if even that--- is there anything else this alliance seeks to accomplish?

Will Richard Trumka and these "leaders" of faith communities be leading people in massive protests like those rocking Europe?

Or will these people go hat-in-hand begging to Obama for a few crumbs and bones.

During the 1930's movements of the unemployed held massive mobilizations demanding the New Deal.

Obama is obviously on a course charted by Wall Street... does this new alliance intend to use full force by mobilizing its members--- union and faith based--- as Martin Luther King did?

I would point out that prior to Malcolm X's assassination he and King were in the process of forging a powerful alliance that most likely would have included some unions. As you know, the George Meany/Lane Kirkland cabal never supported the Civil Rights movement or the march that King led in Memphis at the time he was murdered.

Are you telling us that Richard Trumka is now going to finally lead the AFL-CIO on a path that it should have been on all these years? I don't think so. What Trumka is trying to head off here is a massive rank-and-file anger and disgust with his big mouth yapping all the time about how he is going to do this and that and form this alliance and that alliance and making threats to hold Obama and the Democrats accountable and then he just moves on to the next interview or press conference.

1.1 billion dollars dollars of working peoples' hard earned money flushed down the toilet supporting a bunch of Dumb Donkeys Trumka can't even influence when it counts on something like extending unemployment benefits.

Instead of wasting all this money supporting a bunch of Dumb Donkeys that only leave behind a pile of donkey dung for working people to try to grab before the sparrows get at it isn't my idea of money well spent.

I would note that these this is the very same "community of faith" group Trumka worked with to elect Barack Obama and these people, Trumka included, are pledged to elect Obama again after having been handed what the sparrows have left behind.

If this alliance between the AFL-CIO and the "faith community" was a movement being led by people with outlooks similar to Martin Luther King, Jr. or Malcolm X or William Winpisinger or William Z. Foster or Wyndham Mortimer I might have some confidence in what is being said here... but, it isn't.

We have all heard Trumka with his big mouth holding press conferences before with outfits like the Campaign for America's Future and the same old slew of foundation funded outfits working with George Soro's money like The Century Foundation and so far they haven't followed through on a damn thing.

Martin Luther King, Malcolm X and those who built our great industrial unions that have now disintegrated into beggars had to build grassroots and rank-and-file movements forcing Roosevelt to act because the same "labor leaders" from which Trumka is derived refused to even support things like Unemployment Compensation or Social Security.

Again, today, working people are going to have to take matters into their own hands because Richard Trumka and the AFL-CIO refuse to free up the resources they are sitting on to organize real campaigns for social and economic justice.

And while we are speaking of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., I would remind you the King was speaking out against that dirty war in Vietnam in Memphis only hours before his assassination... Richard Trumka has yet to speak out against these dirty wars in Iraq and Afghanistan killing our jobs just like they are killing the people of Iraq and Afghanistan... and Trumka fails to realize that we can not have an economy of "guns and butter" at the same time because spending on wars and militarism robs us of the very resources and wealth we need to create jobs.

Furthermore, Richard Trumka has bought into this crap of "allowing the free market to create jobs." There is no two ways about this; to solve this unemployment mess the government has to become the employer of first choice by putting people to work solving the problems of people and society.

I don't know many people who trust Trumka since he sold us out on health care reform after his own memberships told him they wanted single-payer/medicare for all. I remind you it was this same group now being cobbled together by Trumka that spearheaded the drive to kill single-payer by insisting we all get behind Obama's "health care reform" that turned out to be the "Health Care and Pharmaceutical Industry Bailout and Profit Maximization Act of 2010" and in supporting this crap Trumka and his "faith community" have left everyone to fend for themselves in trying to figure out what to do as they are being dropped from their supplemental Medicare insurance programs.

If you think I am fed up you should travel Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan to listen to what working people have to say.

Sunday, December 5, 2010

My response to some comments…

Alan L. Maki

I will try to improve my grammar. Let me know if you find this grammar any better.


In view of your response which I appreciate, I would ask you a question: Is the MN DFL losing votes because of third party candidates; or, is this loss of votes because people feel they aren't being adequately represented by the DFL so people aren't bothering to vote at all?


I would say this, also; it is very difficult to vote for DFL candidates who boast to the media that they are more conservative than their Republican opponents. Collin Peterson, Dave Olin and Bernie Lieder did just this.
Why would I want to vote for any candidate who boasts of being conservative? If I wanted to vote for a conservative I would vote Republican.


Collin Peterson was supported by the Tea Party. Representative Dave Olin boasted in huge newspaper advertisements that he was endorsed by the National Rifle Association. I certainly would not walk across the street to vote for either Peterson or Olin. And I would never ever vote Republican unless Abe Lincoln were to rise from the grave but I doubt Lincoln would run on the Republican Party ticket.

Chances are good, and I realize it is always tricky trying to speak for the dead, but I seriously would doubt Lincoln would run on the Republican or Democratic Party ticket. Chances are pretty good Lincoln would help organize an anti-corporate, pro labor party.

I am wiling to vote DFL--- no problem; I voted for Mark Dayton. But, I am not going to move myself further to the right of Mark Dayton to do so simply because there is nothing to be gained by working people in doing this. Quite frankly, I possibly wasted my time voting for Dayton if he intends to begin "compromising" with Republicans rather than fighting them.


For working people politics is not some kind of game where the game is won and lost based upon keeping score of how many Democrats get elected versus how many Republicans get elected. For working people politics is part of the struggle to defend gains already won and win improvements in their lives and working conditions.

Working people in Minnesota have not received one single benefit since Rudy Perpich was governor. Since Perpich, the Democrats have rolled over and let the Republicans walk all over them.

My suggestion to Dayton is that he reach out to his supporters and mobilize them in a way that he gets his liberal agenda pushed through by using the brute force a united working class is capable of delivering, and that he use this time fighting the Republicans to recruit candidates with the moral and political courage to ride his liberal coat-tails to victory in 2012 rather than candidates who run away from being called liberal, progressive or left.


I don't think it is too much to ask of the Democrats that in return for our votes they deliver something of real substance for working people... like the "jobs, jobs, jobs" they are always so fond of talking about during campaigns.


I notice no Democrat has the courage to talk about the 41,000 jobs they created for Minnesotans in the Indian Gaming Industry where these workers, because of "Compacts" the Democrats devised specifically for the creation of this industry we now have 41,000 Minnesotans working in loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos at poverty wages without any rights protected under state or federal labor laws. In casinos that are now the centers for drug dealing, prostitution, fencing of stolen merchandise and a sundry of illegal gambling on everything from betting on the ponies to professional and even college and high school sports. Not only is all of this terribly destructive to the lives of casino workers and their families but all this crime and corruption is tearing apart the local communities where these casinos are located.

Minnesota's workers have lost over 90,000 jobs in the taconite, forestry, auto and airline industries with the only large-scale creation of jobs being the 41,000 in the Indian Gaming Industry. Would you call this an accomplishment of the MN DFL? Like I said, usually the creation of 41,000 jobs would be something to brag and boast about. For some strange reason no DFL politicians campaign on the basis of having created these 41,000 jobs.


The MN DFL should be ashamed of itself that not one single Native American Indian is sitting in the Minnesota State Legislature and among our Congressional delegation. Redistricting is getting underway and the leadership of the Minnesota DFL has not even brought forward a proposal that would give Native American Indians a fair shot being elected in House District 4-A or Senate District 4; or Congressional Districts 7 or 8.


Even when the DFL had majorities in the House and Senate, not one single DFL'er had the moral or political courage to call for the repeal of "at-will hiring; at-will firing" which is the primary impediment to union organizing in Minnesota. By the way, the DFL has allowed Stanley Crooks of the huge Mystic Lake Casino/Hotel empire to get away for years in forcing employees to sign a statement as a condition of their employment declaring that they understand they will be terminated (fired) if they engage in union organizing.


Not one single DFL elected official has had the moral or political courage to step forward and explain to Minnesotans how the disgraceful poverty plaguing the Indian Nations is by intent so that the Indian Gaming Industry has a steady supply of cheap labor. Poverty wage jobs means poverty. Unemployment means poverty.
I hope my grammar is understandable in this post.

Richard Trumka used his FaceBook page to announce another “press release coalition”

My response:

 

@Timothy... its a little late for "buying American made." We can't even go to the grocery store and purchase American grown meat, vegetables and fruit.

@Barbara... the question is joining with the "communities of faith" to do what?

Richard Trumka makes a mockery out of all of this... the UAW has supported Obama's new trade pact with South Korea, the USW is going to be following--- and by all accounts Trumka has already given his "blessing" to this trade pact that will destroy more jobs here in this country... throwing more people into the unemployment lines.

I'm glad to see Trumka finally included child care as part of a public jobs program--- a National Public Child Care Program would provide jobs for around 5,000,000 people.

What Trumka continues to refuse to support is a National Public Health Care Program providing the American people with free health care through over 30,000 community health care centers which would be the biggest job creation program of all--- 10,000,000 new jobs!

What Trumka also refuses to come to grips with is that we can't achieve any of this as long as this rotten government continues to piss away our tax-dollars and resources--- the wealth of our Nation--- on these dirty wars killing our jobs just like they kill people.

I find it completely hypocritical of Trumka to be talking about the need to support the unemployed with food stamps after he just got done supporting Obama's legislation protecting the jobs of some teachers at the expense of cutting food stamps to the poorest of the poor who are already the long-term unemployed.

This entire "green economy, green jobs" is one big fiasco that is never going to pan out for working people--- we have already seen the jobs involve lower pay and less benefits with increased electric bills for consumers (consumers who are--- by and large--- working people). The only way this "green economy, green jobs" can work is if it proceeds as a complete government project similar to the Tennessee Valley Authority--- manufacturing and energy production must be done through public ownership not Wall Street's dictate.

We need to open up a broad public discussion bringing working people fully into the decision-making process--- instead, we only learn of decisions once they have been made.

I am highly offended that a leader of organized labor would not include a moratorium on ALL home foreclosures and evictions as part of this kind of program... in fact, the demand should be to put people back into their homes retroactively to when this fleecing and scamming of the people--- again mostly working people--- actually began.

The time has come for Richard Trumka and the union leaders of this country to break with Obama and make a sharp turn left.

Richard Trumka keeps making all of these posts on facebook and he is so damn arrogant he won't even engage i discussion with working people here... he is afraid to defend his worthless, do-nothing, Obama-loving policies leading to increasing misery for working people.

Either mobilize the working class to take on Obama and Wall Street or just sit and pray... but, don't pretend something is being done when its only a nice sounding press release intended to make people think something is actually being done when nothing is being done. We have heard this big talk before of "coalition partners" joining forces to do something... only to have these efforts never materialize because actually mobilizing people to fight until these things are won would prove to be an embarrassment to Obama and the Democrats.

How damn stupid does Trumka take us for?

 

Here is Trumka’s statement… he still doesn’t ask working people how Obama’s war economy is working for them--- all hype, no substance--- one more farce when a struggle is needed:

Faith Groups Join In Jobs Campaign

by Richard Trumka on Thursday, December 2, 2010 at 4:30pm

In times of crisis, many American families turn to their religious faith for inspiration and hope. With millions of people unemployed, America’s faith community, which includes many union members, is mobilizing to provide tangible, hands-on aid to families as well as spiritual solace.

Under the leadership of Interfaith Worker Justice (IWJ), faith groups, political leaders and progressive activists have come together in the Faith Advocates for Jobs Campaign, which was launched today at a Capitol Hill meeting. The campaign will help combat the severe unemployment crisis that is devastating so many working people and families and help rebuild the foundations of our nation’s economy.

In its mission statement, the campaign says:

As people of faith, we call for an economy that provides a job for everyone who wants and needs one. We affirm that all jobs should be good jobs, paying living wages and benefits, allowing workers dignity and a voice at the workplace, ensuring workers’ health and safety, and guaranteeing their right to organize unions.

The campaign will begin an ambitious effort to organize 1,000 congregation-based unemployed worker support committees in 2011. The committees will support working people and families economically, emotionally and spiritually, while also educating members about the unemployment crisis and advocacy avenues available to them.

The committees, composed of both the employed and the currently unemployed, will be part of a nation-wide network that will push for new policy initiatives to address the jobs crisis, including

An economic stimulus package to create and retain millions of jobs, including revitalizing the manufacturing sector.

A public jobs program as a component of the economic stimulus package.

A public jobs program that will create vital and sustainable jobs: jobs that will rebuild our nation’s infrastructure; green jobs; mass transit; jobs that the private sector cannot create, such as expanded child care and clean-up of toxic dumps.

Support for unemployed workers and families. This support should include extended unemployment benefits for the long-term unemployed, COBRA subsidies, food stamps, and other safety net programs.

Support for states and municipalities to maintain and strengthen social safety programs, retain teachers, police, fire fighters, and other essential public workers.

Development of educational programs in support of job creation and retention and a restored economy.

Saturday, December 4, 2010

How do we challenge the political power structure…

A few random thoughts on this discussion---

First, let me just say that I don't know who this Turchick is (not that it makes any difference who Turchick is) but it seems completely irrelevant to me whether or not one has a chance of winning an election as to whether liberals, progressives and the left come together to run a candidate/s... you have to start someplace.

Plus I don't think "beauty" has anything to do with politics or I would have been elected to something a long time ago--- even if I hardly ever get haircuts.

To get serious...

When I look at Michelle Bachman or Amy "Republican Lite" Klobuchar... all I see in either one of them is the ugliness of war, racism and poverty.

You know, I have yet to see any Democrat or Republican concede a race prior to an election even when all the polls show them trailing badly... why should a coalition of liberals, progressives and leftists make any decision about running candidates for political office because they might not win... or, because they might lose?

We saw the impact that even a very small fledgling political party and movement without any financial resources propelled by honest people concerned about their lives and livelihoods and the livability of their communities can have even though they didn't win an election with what the "Warriors for Justice" have achieved up here in northern Minnesota in spite of having to take on a very racist and corrupt political establishment of Democrats, Republicans and Independence Party... not only did they generate tremendous interest and concern for their issues; but, because of their common sense and very practical approach in making electoral politics part of their long-term strategy... we now have Mark Dayton elected as Governor of Minnesota--- the most liberal Governor in the Nation--- unfortunately there are no progressive or left governors in the country.

Mark Dayton's campaign was washed up and done for and this is why Brian Melendez felt so arrogantly smug in kicking him out of the MNDFL State Convention--- but, little did Melendez know that Warrior for Justice Greg Paquin would respond to this undemocratic maneuver, and in defense of affirmative action, by standing as a Delegate and nominating Dayton from the convention floor--- a very sharp move that all the media quickly picked up on because there was an outpouring of support for Dayton from the convention floor which had to signal to Melendez and company that Margaret Anderson Kelliher was in deep, deep trouble since it became very apparent that Greg Paquin's move demonstrated that there would now be massive grassroots support for Dayton from the most important DFL activists in the Primary... support for Dayton that Melendez and company assumed that their circus without a Dayton presence would provide the kind of united effort to give Margaret Anderson Kelliher an easy victory in the Primary.

The Warriors for Justice had previously used their influence to get Dayton to publicly state a commitment to enforcing affirmative action which has NEVER been enforced here in Minnesota in spite of state and federal legislation mandating its enforcement.

If Dayton can't do anything else because of opposition from Republicans who refuse to cough up money or tax the rich, Dayton can see to it that he makes good on his promise to enforce affirmative action pursuant to Federal Executive Order #11246 and the state statute that mirrors the federal mandate... it won't cost one dime; other than for the paper needed to write a letter to every state agency and the stamps to send a copy to all 87 counties.

Liberals, progressives and the left from labor, civil rights, peace and the environmental movements have been pathetically too divided to get behind a candidate who is serious about bringing about real change. The racism within these movements has been readily apparent, too--- one need only look at the "color" of the demonstrations and even the DFL state conventions to know this to be true and this racism has divided liberals, progressives and leftists just as it has divided our society in general to the point where not one single Native American Indian is sitting amongst our more than 200 state legislators or our congressional delegation and poverty and unemployment is soaring beyond anything one could imagine on Indian Reservations and urban areas with large Native American Indian populations simply because the casino industry wants a huge pool of cheap labor.

The abysmal DFL leadership has been able to twist liberals, progressives and even the left around its corrupt, greedy little fingers--- cases in point are the DFL Progressive Caucus which claims membership in the Progressive Democrats of America, the Sierra Club and the other established environmental organizations--- mostly all foundation funded, the NAACP and Urban League and the Minnesota AFL-CIO... but even many of the peace organizations who buy into this crap every time sleaze-balls like Amy Klobuchar or Keith Ellison say: "Come see me in my office I will take care of you." Once there its "ten minutes and get out."

In fact, the big-business/AIPAC/casino/health insurance/war industry interests in control of the MN DFL have gone all out to try to prevent:

1. Fed up people from bolting the DFL

2. Marginalizing anyone and everyone and any group or organization concerned about peace, social and economic justice.

This entire scenario needs to be firmly challenged in a very straight-forward, direct, principled, united AND WELL ORGANIZED manner--- we saw what happened to Jack Nelson Pallmeyer when he thought he was going to go after the money from the Indian Gaming Industry and get support from the corrupt tribal councils without going out among the people suffering real with real problems while ignoring the plight of casino workers--- it didn't take much effort on our part--- after making repeated requests to Pallmeyer and his handlers to bring forward the plight of casino worker (over 40,000 Minnesotans) for us to derail his campaign real quick like by pointing out his hypocrisy. Just like we went after Mike Hatch when he smugly thought he was going to have an easy run for governor.

We didn't need this report from this Turchick to know that Amy Klobuchar is VERY vulnerable in 2012 and we intend to take complete advantage of this... in the same way we hammered away at Oberstar, State Senator Mary Olson, Representatives Brita Sailer, Dave Olin and that pathetic excuse for a politician--- Bernie Lieder... all of whom were in the same stable and owned by the Minnesota Indian Gaming Association.

The Minnesota DFL has now paid a very heavy price for making the racist, anti-union and thoroughly corrupt Minnesota Indian Gaming Association its partner rather than the working people of Minnesota... our first success was in defeating DFL candidate Valerie Solem whose election would have given the DFL a House majority--- when Ray Waldron and the AFL-CIO, after a lengthy three hour screaming and hollering match in his office said we didn't dare wage a campaign to defeat a Democrat we showed this worthless labor "leader" that we meant business and we served notice the only focus of our political activities would be to defeat Solem... and, in spite of the polls and everyone saying we couldn't be successful because it was "the year of Democrats" we were successful in defeating her... and we showed Mike Hatch the same thing because he threatened to get injunctions against us.

I will tell you flat out--- I take no pleasure in seeing Republicans elected; however, if the only Democrats being thrown at us are no better and often even worse than Republicans we are going to continue using the tactics we have so successfully in punishing our enemies at the polls on Election Day... and we certainly aren't going to support those claiming to be progressive like Jack Nelson Pallmeyer even if he is right on issues of peace and some social reforms if he doesn't have the courage to stand up for what is right and just by working people--- after being subjected to our attacks he managed to try to cover his tracks by securing a letter of support from the real Norma Rae... but, he should have been concerned with the injustices and plight of more than 40,000 Minnesotans and the resulting poverty from a racist and corrupt Indian Gaming Industry.

We would like to work with all who are for peace and social justice in defeating both worthless business-serving Democrats and Republicans to elect real liberals, progressives and leftists to office in Minnesota.

I would suggest that a state-wide conference be convened at the earliest possible time after the Holidays where we can all discuss these issues in a frank and open manner... an all-inclusive conference with an open call going out welcoming all liberals, progressives and leftists with a primary objective of coming up with a candidate for the United States Senate to run against Amy "Republican Lite" Klobuchar... if Klobuchar loses because of our efforts it is her own damn fault; and that we closely examine the work of the Warriors for Justice and invite them to participate because as far as I can see, they have been the most successful in wresting from politicians the kind of change we need here in Minnesota.

For those who have been baiting me with accusations that the only reason we supported Mark Dayton was because we were able to reach agreement with him on several issues, I say, "So what." My job is to represent casino workers... casino workers whose union organizing efforts include more progressive initiatives than any other unions in this state... if you are going to wait for the backwards leadership of these foundation funded environmental organizations, in-fighting leftists, worthless union bureaucrats, and do-nothing civil rights organizations or the Minnesota League of Women Voters or the ACLU or any of these other Democratic Party fronts to move on peace, social and economic justice issues you will be dead before there is any change in Minnesota.

There are no shortcuts for real social change; we need to go back to square one and begin building the kind of liberal, progressive left coalition at a grassroots level like what won the New Deal reforms and civil rights legislation. If we put our minds, our efforts and our limited resources together we can take the first step of setting up small electoral committees for real change in all 87 Minnesota counties... these need not be large committees to start with--- three to four people working around kitchen tables to get things going.

You know, over the last ten years the peace and social justice movements in Minnesota have been in dire straits because all these small peace and social justice groups have been at each others throats... trying to be first in line to get permits for demonstrations so they can control who the speakers will be, what the demands will be... and even what the tactics will be and all to often this has resulted in exclusion rather than inclusion (not to mention a lot of needless arrests)--- not good when the objective is to build UNITED movements.

I hope people will consider the idea of calling a statewide electoral conference of concerned liberals, progressives and leftists in a centrally located place where everyone will feel comfortable expressing their views--- no exclusion, only inclusion.

Let me close by saying that I support a position where people should feel part of this movement because there is unity on certain issues and bringing forward an alternative agenda... some people may want to continue working in the Democratic Party, others may want to break free of the two-party trap--- it would seem to me there is room for all based upon a solid alternative agenda... my own inclination is that Klobuchar should face a primary challenge and if unsuccessful everyone should be willing to back a third party alternative like maybe seeing if the Warriors for Justice would be willing to consider going statewide. They got the idea for the name from Stuart Acuff's (an AFL-CIO organizer) and Richard Levin's (a Minnesota professor)excellent little book--- Getting America Back to Work which everyone might want to read in order to get to the point where we have a place to begin our discussions from. Also, George Lakoff wrote an excellent little book--- "Don't think of an elephant"--- with lots of good ideas (except for one big problem he recommends no specific solutions be brought forward... but Acuff and Levin take care of this pretty well)

A fairly basic alternative agenda to what has been offered by politicians to Minnesotans should be quite easy for us to arrive at--- its about jobs, jobs, jobs... putting people to work solving problems of the people (health care and child care; rebuilding our infrastructure, defending public education, re-forestation, saving the Ford Plant and 2,000 jobs, and coming up with ways to pay (like ending the wars and taxing the rich).

In struggle and solidarity,

Alan L. Maki

Director of Organizing,

Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council

Mark Dayton wins in recount!

Alan L. Maki

The drawback:


Dayton now has a Republican dominated majority in the House and Senate to contend with because the well-heeled business interests in the Democratic Party refused to work to help elect Dayton who centered his campaign around a populist leftist agenda of "tax the rich." Instead of those Democrats running for House and Senate seats attaching themselves to Dayton's very liberal coat-tails, these opportunist politicians chose to distance themselves from Dayton at the Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party's state convention in Duluth and in both the Primary and General Elections--- the result was their own loss.
The voices of the working people will now become the determining and over-riding factor in Minnesota politics--- are YOU prepared to vigorously speak out?

Friday, December 3, 2010

A response to Angela Davis…

 

ANGELA DAVIS: Again, I would return to the election of Barack Obama. Barack Obama was elected despite that kind of a lobby, despite the power of money. And so, we have to continue the campaign for a better world, drawing upon all of our resources.

 

Alan L. Maki

It should be pointed out that Angela Davis is a member of an organization that was very instrumental in organizing "Progressives for Obama" along with the poster boy for the Israeli killing machine, Tom Hayden and the biggest bully on the "left," Carl Davidson who viciously attacks everyone and anyone who so much as asks the question: Does Obama work for Wall Street or Main Street? By-the-way, Tim Wise is also a member of the "Progressives for Obama."


Angela Davis should be challenged for the ridiculous and totally false claims she is making about Barack Obama. She and her outfit the Committees of Correspondence for Peace and Socialism like to make the claim that they helped to elect Barack Obama when in fact their role was to intentionally confuse people and lead people to believe that Barack Obama, if not actually liberal or progressive, the he at least "leaned" in this direction... obviously, this was a completely wrong assessment, and a totally dishonest assessment because I had sent Carl Davidson, Bill Fletcher, Jr., Tom Hayden and Danny Glover all a copy of the essay Barack Obama had written in Foreign Affairs Magazine in 2007... except for Danny Glover, each of them responded back to me with a litany of insults obviously intended to try to bully and badger me into stop circulating this Obama essay with the very short and simple question:


"After reading this essay written by Barack Obama for the publication of the Council on Foreign Relations' magazine, Foreign Affairs Magazine, do you believe Barack Obama is liberal, progressive or left and do you really believe Barack Obama is going to work for anyone other than Wall Street and the merchants of death and destruction--- Wall Street's military-financial-industrial complex?"


In fact, what Angela Davis refuses to discuss is an organization and outfit called:

ALEC...

http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=History&Template=%2FCM%2FHTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=13643


Members of ALEC contributed millions of dollars to Barack Obama's campaign... anyone can check out this organization's website. This outfit is one of the principle lobbyists for the prison-industrial complex. I posted this information to Angela Davis' FaceBook page and after a couple days it was deleted by the administrators.
I am still trying to figure out how it is that anyone, Angela Davis or anyone else, can make the claim that Barack Obama was elected as a result of "Again, I would return to the election of Barack Obama. Barack Obama was elected despite that kind of a lobby, despite the power of money. And so, we have to continue the campaign for a better world, drawing upon all of our resources."


In fact, Barack Obama never would have been elected president unless big Wall Street money purchasing the best Madison Avenue and Hollywood could provide was backing him. In fact, Homer Simpson could have been elected to the presidency with this kind of backing from Wall Street.


Tim Wise is dishonest in failing to state that he is a member of the Progressives for Obama as he defends Angela Davis' pathetically dishonest remarks about Obama as quoted above.


Everyone should read what Angela Davis had to say here, and instead of trying to intimidate and bully people like Angela Davis' colleague Tim Wise has done here towards people who raise questions... these questions should be welcomed and completely discussed because Obama is either going to have to be "primaried out," forced to resign in shame as the liar and Elmer Gantry that he is--- not unlike Richard Nixon, or we are going to have to run a ticket--- a united liberal-progressive-left ticket outside of the two-party system--- what Angela Davis, when she was campaigning to run for Vice-president on the CPUSA ticket called "the two-party trap... a trap she has apparently been caught up in herself as she so cavalierly rattles off the issues with Barack Obama with which see claims to disagree. Where are those issues upon which see sought the Vice-presidency when she ran on the Communist Party USA ticket with Gus Hall? Certainly not in the interview below---


AMY GOODMAN: Angela Davis, I wanted to ask you about building a new world and ask you about your thoughts on the eve of the election of President Obama, what you were thinking, the hopes you had at the time, and now, two years later, where we stand today. I mean, November 4th, 2008, this remarkable moment, an African American man elected in a land with the legacy of slavery, you know, the land of Frederick Douglass. Where we came from then and where we are today, Professor Davis?


ANGELA DAVIS: Well, of course, initially, few people believed that a figure like Barack Obama could ever be elected to the presidency of the United States, and because there were those who persisted, and, you know, largely young people, who helped to build this movement to elect Barack Obama, making use of all of the new technologies of communication. And so, on that day, November 4th, 2008, when Obama was elected, this was a world historical event. People celebrated literally all over the world—in Africa, in Europe, in Asia, in South America, in the Caribbean, in the US. I was in Oakland, and there was literally dancing in the street. I didn’t—I don’t remember any other moment that can compare to that collective euphoria that gripped people all over the world.


Now, here we are two years later, and many people are treating this as if it were business as usual. As a matter of fact, many people are dissatisfied with the Obama administration, because they fail to fulfill all of our dreams. And, you know, one of the points that I frequently make is that we have to beware of our tendency here in this country to look for messiahs and to project our own possible potential power on to others. What really disturbs me is that we have failed. Well, of course, I’m dissatisfied with many of the things that Obama has done. The war in Afghanistan needs to end right now. The healthcare bill could have been much stronger than it turned out to be. There are many issues about which we can be critical of Obama, but at the same time, I think we need to be critical of ourselves for not generating the kind of mass pressure to compel the Obama administration to move in a more progressive direction, remembering that the election was, in large part, primarily the result of just such a mass movement that was created by ordinary people all over the country.


AMY GOODMAN: We have fifteen seconds.


ANGELA DAVIS: Again, I would return to the election of Barack Obama. Barack Obama was elected despite that kind of a lobby, despite the power of money. And so, we have to continue the campaign for a better world, drawing upon all of our resources.

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Obama asked that I write a letter to the editor…

Organizing for America asked us to write letters. I went to the OFA web site and sent this letter:


From [edit] Alan Maki <amaki000@centurytel.net>

58891 County Road 13
Warroad, MN 56763

218-386-2432

To [edit] The Forum, Star Tribune, St. Paul Pioneer Press, Duluth News-Tribune, Sioux Falls Argus-Leader, Rochester Post-Bulletin, Grand Forks Herald, St. Cloud Times, The Hibbing Daily Tribune, USA Today, The Washington Post, New York Times, Financial Times, American Metal Market

NOTE: Each recipient will only see his/her own email address.

Subject [edit] Had enough of Obama yet?

Message [edit]

 

Barack Obama is going to freeze the pay of civilian federal employees whose unions supported his campaign.

This is from the office of President Barack Obama:

"On Monday the President announced a proposal to freeze civilian pay for non-military federal employees for two years—a plan that will lead to $60 billion in savings over 10 years."

Obama could put an end to his dirty wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and save a lot more.

Obama's wars are making us all poor; how is Obama's war economy working for you?

Had your fill of Obama yet?

Monday, November 29, 2010

Minnesota U.S. Senator Amy “Republican Lite” Klobuchar…

Wants to give life prison sentences to those who released government documents through Wikileaks.

Amy "Republican Lite" Klobuchar... she is one of the reasons Democrats suffered such setbacks at the polls... Democrats can only go so far to the right trying to secure the votes from the well-heeled middle class suburbia and the gated communities before they create a base for Republicans... figure it out... how far to the right can these Democrats move before liberals, progressives and the left--- the historic coalition for real change aimed at solving the problems of working people--- don't bother showing up at the polls. And to top it off, Klobuchar has joined Obama's attack on public workers! She supports two wars and drone attacks on Pakistan, voted to increase the national debt which will mean austerity for America's workers; her candidacy is bank-rolled by the huge health insurance companies, the military industries, big banks, the mining companies, the grain cartels and the power generating industries... plus she is supported by union leaders--- the same ones who backed Obama--- including public workers' unions whose members are now being run over by Obama's speeding bus.

The consider this: Democrats could have brought people out to the polls in droves and trounced the Republicans just by ending these dirty wars and redirected the money towards two huge job creating programs solving the problems of the people at the same time by creating some 15 million jobs through a National Public Health Care System and a National Public Child Care System providing people with free services in each area PLUS with all these people working and paying into Social Security there could be an increase in both benefits and an expansion into more programs.

Amy "Republican Lite" Klobuchar... add repression for telling the truth that has embarrassed the United States government to the list of Dumb Donkeys.

Alan L. Maki

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Now would be a good time to review this statement from the Progressives for Obama…

The group Progressives for Obama has changed its name but is still backing Barack Obama… one has to wonder how it is anyone could possibly believe what is written here… I find it interesting that this group will not tolerate any discussion from those liberals, progressives and leftists in opposition to backing Obama yet their mission statement is obviously very flawed and based on a false assessment of what Barack Obama stands for and who he really is… check it out, see what you think:

 

About Us

Barack Is Our Best Option –And You’re Needed Now! The Initial Call for'Progressives for Obama' for the Campaign March 24th, 2008 by Tom Hayden, Bill Fletcher, Jr., Barbara Ehrenreich, and Danny Glover All American progressives should unite for Barack Obama. We descend from the proud tradition of independent social movements that have made America a more just and democratic country. We believe that the movement today supporting Barack Obama continues this great tradition of grass-roots participation drawing millions of people out of apathy and into participation in the decisions that affect all our lives. We believe that Barack Obama’s very biography reflects the positive potential of the globalization process that also contains such grave threats to our democracy when shaped only by the narrow interests of private corporations in an unregulated global marketplace. We should instead be globalizing the values of equality, a living wage and environmental sustainability in the new world order, not hoping our deepest concerns will be protected by trickle down economics or charitable billionaires. By its very existence, the Obama campaign will stimulate a vision of globalization from below. As progressives we believe this sudden and unexpected new movement is just what America needs. The future has arrived. The alternative would mean a return to the dismal status quo party politics that have failed so far to deliver peace, health care, full employment and effective answers to crises like global warming. During past progressive peaks in our political history—the late Thirties, the early Sixties—social movements have provided the relentless pressure and innovative ideas that allowed centrist leaders to embrace visionary solutions. We find ourselves in just such a situation today. We intend to join and engage with our brothers and sisters in the vast rainbow of social movements to come together in support of Obama’s unprecedented campaign and candidacy. Even though it is candidate-centered, there is no doubt that the campaign is a social movement, one greater than the candidate himself ever imagined. Progressives can make a difference in close primary races like Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Oregon, Puerto Rico, and in the November general election. We can contribute our dollars. We have the proven online capacity to reach millions of swing voters in the primary and general election. We can and will defend Obama against negative attacks from any quarter. We will seek Green support against the claim of some that there are no real differences between Obama and McCain. We will criticize any efforts by Democratic super-delegates to suppress the winner of the popular and delegate votes, or to legitimize the flawed elections in Michigan and Florida. We will make our agenda known at the Democratic national convention and fight for a platform emphasizing progressive priorities as the path to victory. Obama’s March 17 speech on racism was as great a speech as ever given by a presidential candidate, revealing a philosophical depth, personal authenticity, and political intelligence that should convince any but the hardest of ideologues that he carries unmatched leadership potentials for overcoming the divide-and-conquer tactics which have sundered Americans since the first slaves arrived here in chains. Only words? What words they were. However, the fact that Barack Obama openly defines himself as a centrist invites the formation of this progressive force within his coalition. Anything less could allow his eventual drift towards the right as the general election approaches. It was the industrial strikes and radical organizers in the 1930s who pushed Roosevelt to support the New Deal. It was the civil rights and student movements that brought about voting rights legislation under Lyndon Johnson and propelled Eugene McCarthy and Bobby Kennedy’s anti-war campaigns. It was the original Earth Day that led Richard Nixon to sign environmental laws. And it will be the Obama movement that makes it necessary and possible to end the war in Iraq, renew our economy with a populist emphasis, and confront the challenge of global warming. We should not only keep the pressure on, but we also should connect the issues that Barack Obama has made central to his campaign into an overarching progressive vision. - The Iraq War must end as rapidly as possible, not in five years. All our troops must be withdrawn. Diplomacy and trade must replace further military occupation or military escalation into Iran and Pakistan. We should not stop urging Barack Obama to avoid leaving American advisers behind in Iraq in a counterinsurgency quagmire like Afghanistan today or Central America in the 1970s and 1980s. Nor should he simply transfer American combat troops from the quagmire in Iraq to the quagmire in Afghanistan. - Iraq cannot be separated from our economic crisis. Iraq is costing trillions of dollars that should be invested in jobs, universal health care, education, housing and public works here at home. Our own Gulf Coast requires the attention and funds now spent on Gulf oil. - Iraq cannot be separated from our energy crisis. We are spending an unheard-of $100/barrel for oil. We are officially committed to wars over oil supplies far into the future. We instead need a war against global warming and for energy independence from Middle Eastern police states and multinational corporations. Progressives should support Obama’s 16-month combat troop withdrawal plan in comparison to Clinton’s open-ended one, and demand that both candidates avoid a slide into four more years of low-visibility counterinsurgency. The Democratic candidates should listen more to the blunt advice of the voters instead of the timid talk of their national security advisers. Two-thirds of American voters, and a much higher percentage of Democrats, oppose this war and favor withdrawal in less than two years, nearly half of them in less than one year. The same percentage believe the war has had a negative effect on life in the United States, while only 15 percent believe the war has been positive. Without this solid peace sentiment, neither Obama nor Clinton would be taking the stands they do today. Further, the battered and abused people of Iraq favor an American withdrawal by a 70 percent margin. The American government’s arrogant defiance of these strong popular majorities in both America and Iraq should be ended this November by a powerful peace mandate. The profound transition from the policies of the past will not be easy, and fortunately the Obama campaign is lifted by the fresh wind of change. We seek not only to change the faces in high places, however, but to save our country from slow death by greed, status quo politics, and loss of vision. The status quo cannot stand much longer, neither that of politics-as-usual nor that of our security, energy and economic policies. We are stealing from the next generation’s future, and living on borrowed time. The Bush Administration has replaced the Cold War with the War on Terrorism led by the same military-industrial complex that President Eisenhower warned against. The reality and public fear of terrorism today is no less real than fear of communism and nuclear annihilation a generation ago. But we simply cannot continue multiple military interventions in many Muslim countries without increasing the vast number of violent jihadists against us, bleeding our military and our economy, becoming more dependent on Middle East oil, creating unsavory alliances with police states, shrinking our own civil liberties and putting ourselves at permanent risk of another 9/11 attack. We need a brave turn towards peace and conflict resolution in the Middle East and the Muslim world. Getting out of Iraq, sponsoring a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, ending alliances with police states in the Arab world, unilaterally initiating real energy independence and moving the world away from the global warming crises are the steps that must be taken. Nor can we impose NAFTA-style trade agreements on so many nations that seek only to control their own national resources and economic destinies. We cannot globalize corporate and financial power over democratic values and institutions. Since the Clinton Administration pushed through NAFTA against the Democratic majority in Congress, one Latin American nation after another has elected progressive governments that reject US trade deals and hegemony. We are isolated in Latin America by our Cold War and drug war crusades, by the $500 million counter-insurgency in Columbia, support for the 2002 coup attempt in Venezuela, and the ineffectual blockade of Cuba. We need to return to the Good Neighbor policies of Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 1930s, which rejected Yankee military intervention and accepted Mexico’s right to nationalize its oil in the face of industry opposition. The pursuit of NAFTA-style trade policies inflames our immigration crisis as well, by uprooting countless campesinos who inevitably seek low-wage jobs north of the border in order to survive. We need balanced and democratically-approved trade agreements that focus on the needs of workers, consumers and the environment. The Banana Republic is a retail chain, not an American colony protected by the Monroe Doctrine. We are pleased that Hillary Clinton has been responsive to the tide of voter opinion this year, and we applaud the possibility of at last electing an American woman president. But progressives should be disturbed at her duplicitous positions on Iraq and NAFTA. She still denies that her 2002 vote for legislation which was called the war authorization bill was a vote for war authorization. She now promises to “end the war” but will not set a timeline for combat troop withdrawal, and remains committed to leaving tens of thousands of counter-terrorism troops and trainers in Iraq amidst a sectarian conflict. While Obama needs to clarify his own position on counterinsurgency, Clinton’s “end the war” rhetoric conceals an open commitment to keep American troops in Iraq until all our ill-defined enemies are defeated—a treadmill which guarantees only the spawning of more enemies. On NAFTA, she claims to have opposed the trade deal behind closed doors when she was First Lady. But the public record, and documents recently disclosed in response to litigation, proves that she was a cheerleader for NAFTA against the strong opposition of rank-and-file Democrats. The Clintons ushered in the Wall Street Democrats whose deregulation ethos has widened inequality while leaving millions of Americans without their rightful protections against market shocks. Clinton’s most bizarre claim is that Obama is unqualified to be commander-in-chief. Clinton herself never served in the military, and has no experience in the armed services apart from the Senate armed services committee. Her husband had no military experience before becoming president. In fact he was a draft opponent during Vietnam, a stance we respected. She was the first lady, and he the governor, of one of our smallest states. They brought no more experience, and arguably less, to the White House than Obama would in 2009. We take very seriously the argument that Americans should elect a first woman president, and we abhor the surfacing of sexism in this supposedly post-feminist era. But none of us would vote for Condoleeza Rice as either the first woman or first African-American president. We regret that the choice divides so many progressive friends and allies, but believe that a Clinton presidency would be a Clinton presidency all over again, not a triumph of feminism but a restoration of the aging, power-driven Wall Street Democratic Hawks at a moment when so much more fresh imagination is possible and needed. A Clinton victory could only be achieved by the dashing of hope among millions of young people on whom a better future depends. The style of the Clintons’ attacks on Obama, which are likely to escalate as her chances of winning decline, already risks losing too many Democratic and independent voters in November. We believe that the Hillary Clinton of 1968 would be an Obama volunteer today, just as she once marched in the snows of New Hampshire for Eugene McCarthy against the Democratic establishment. We did not foresee the exciting social movement that is the Obama campaign. Many of us supported other candidates, or waited skeptically as weeks and months passed. But the closeness of the race makes it imperative that everyone on the sidelines, everyone in doubt, everyone vacillating, everyone fearing betrayals and the blasting of hope, everyone quarreling over political correctness, must join this fight to the finish. Not since Robert Kennedy’s 1968 campaign has there been a passion to imagine the world anew like the passion and unprecedented numbers of people mobilized in this campaign. [TOM HAYDEN is author of Ending the War in Iraq, a five-time Democratic convention delegate, former state senator, and board member of the Progressive Democrats of America. BILL FLETCHER, JR., who originated the call for founding “Progressives for Obama,” is the executive editor of Black Commentator, and founder of the Center for Labor Renewal; BARBARA EHRENREICH is the author of Dancing in the Streets[2007] and other popular works and, with Hayden, a member of The Nation’s editorial board. DANNY GLOVER is the respected actor, activist, and chairman of the board of TransAfrica Forum. ]

Monday, November 22, 2010

What the MN AFL-CIO isn’t saying about unemployment compensation extension legislation…

The Minnesota AFL-CIO is blaming the Republicans but the Congressman they supported, Democrat Collin Peterson, voted against extending unemployment compensation, and Mark Froemke, a registered voter in North Dakota, nominated Peterson…

From “Just the Fax” put out by the MN AFL-CIO:

House Republicans Block Unemployment Benefits Extension House Republicans today blocked an effort to maintain federal unemployment insurance (UI) benefits, making a lapse in benefits all but certain when they expire at the end of the month. House Democrats tried to speed the extension through by calling for a suspension of the rules, a procedure which requires a two-thirds majority. Although 258 members—a significant majority—supported the bill, the final vote fell short of the needed margin. The bill, H.R.6419, would have extended UI through February 2011 for those who have exhausted 26 weeks of insurance provided by states. It also would provide 100 percent federal funding to state unemployment programs to cover additional costs. A total of 143 Republicans and 11 Democrats voted against suspending the rules. Twenty-one Republicans voted for it. We commend Representatives Ellison, McCollum, Oberstar, and Walz for voting to help jobless Minnesotans.

 

 

Question: Why would the Minnesota AFL-CIO not mention one of their endorsed and heavily supported and a candidate they heavily funded voted against the interests of workers?

Comment: Mark Froemke, the Communist Party USA member and AFL-CIO and Democratic Party big-shot should explain.

This was a very basic piece of legislation aimed at helping working people survive an economic mess not of their making.

Minnesota workers are entitled to explanations from Shar Knutson and Mark Froemke.

 

Published November 21 2010

“…Needing a two-thirds majority to pass, the measure actually won majority support but not two-thirds support in a 258-154 vote that saw 11 moderate-to-conservative Democrats opposing the extension, including Rep. Collin Peterson, DFL-7th District.”

Bemidji Pioneer Editorial: House says humbug to the jobless

Try to explain to the more than 5 million unemployed Americans that the Great Recession ended a year ago and better times are ahead. Then try to explain to 2 million of them that their jobless benefits will expire in a few short days, during the holiday season. Merry Christmas.

By: Bemidji Pioneer Editorial Board, Bemidji Pioneer

 

Link:

http://www.bemidjipioneer.com/event/article/id/100023740/

 

Editorial in Bemidji Pioneer Press

 

Try to explain to the more than 5 million unemployed Americans that the Great Recession ended a year ago and better times are ahead. Then try to explain to 2 million of them that their jobless benefits will expire in a few short days, during the holiday season. Merry Christmas.

After the Nov, 2 election, Congress is back for a lame-duck session with a lot on its plate before turning the reins over to Republicans in January. Nonetheless of these should be extending jobless benefits for 2 million Americans who lost their jobs through no fault of their own other than being a victim of the Great Recession.

Instead, it seems Congress would rather focus its attention on extending tax cuts to America’s most wealthy. Rest assured, the loss of those tax cuts won’t find any of the wealthy standing in any unemployment line.

There are about 5 million people now collecting unemployment compensation, averaging about $310 a week for those out of work six months or more. Congress extended jobless benefits this summer, but not without some prodding. That extension now expires Dec. 1, and an attempt was made in the House on Thursday to extend them again. Needing a two-thirds majority to pass, the measure actually won majority support but not two-thirds support in a 258-154 vote that saw 11 moderate-to-conservative Democrats opposing the extension, including Rep. Collin Peterson, DFL-7th District.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., pledges to bring the matter back sometime after Thanksgiving as an emergency measure to extend benefits at least through the holidays, and hopefully this time it will have the needed two-thirds majority support. The Senate hopes to roll its effort into year-end negotiations over the tax cut extension and other year-end legislation, leaving the jobless exposed for several weeks through the holidays.

Republican opposition, and we would understand Rep. Peterson’s opposition as well, centers around the cost. It costs $12.5 billion for three months, and opponents would want cuts elsewhere first. That could be possible, and should be pursued if it means allowing a positive vote to extend jobless benefits.

What really would not make sense is a Congress fighting to keep tax cuts for individuals making more than $200,000 a year and couples making more than $250,000 a year while turning their backs on the jobless, the real victims of the Great Recession. And during the holidays to boot.

Humbug! That’s the last thing Republicans want framing their public image when they take over the House and make inroads in the Senate after the first of the year.

None of the casinos in the Indian Gaming Industry are union

None of the casinos in the Indian Gaming Industry are union with the exception of some dealers at Foxwoods who have the most atrocious contract assuring them of the right to live in poverty. The UAW "negotiated" a three-tier contract for these dealers.


I have dozens of Job Application Forms sitting in front of me right now from over 40 casinos in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan requiring employees to sign a statement as part of their terms of "at-will" employment that if they engage in union organizing activity of any kind they will be terminated from employment. This is in direct violation of any kind of state, federal or international labor standards and norms and is completely contrary to the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Indian Nations are being used as fronts for organized crime which owns just about every single slot machine and table game in the United States in the Indian Gaming Industry. There is not one single "Compact" that has been written which includes the protection of casino workers' rights.


Let me know what Tribes are not anti-union and I will go talk to the workers to see if they want to join our union.
In fact, the National Indian Gaming Association and its state affiliates have hired a bunch of thugs, Altegrity/USIS, (<http://peureport.blogspot.com/2009/08/altegrity-usis-history-symbolizes.html >; < http://www.altegrity.com/ > to try to thwart our union organizing efforts.


We made every effort to try to get workers' right written into one of the most recent "Compacts" creating the Gun Lake Casino south of Grand Rapids, Michigan... I personally requested every single union to join our efforts in getting workers' rights protected in this "Compact;" not one single union would lift its finger even though they are fully aware that it is children who suffer from the poverty legislatively imposed on casino workers.


This "casino" money has corrupted every single tribe operating these casinos in the Indian Gaming Industry.

The Minnesota Indian Gaming Association's lobbyists contribute tens of millions of dollars to elect politicians who will enforce the anti-worker, poverty imposing "Compacts" yet this outfit refuses to spend one dime trying to elect Native American Indians to the Minnesota state legislature... Minnesota, with one of the largest Native American populations in the country does not have one single Native American Indian sitting in the state legislature and right now the Minnesota Indian Gaming Association is fighting our redistricting proposal that would enable a Native American Indian to be elected to congress and two Native Americans to be elected to the state legislature (just two out of over two-hundred state legislators).


The Fertitta's have been hired by the Gun Lake Band to manage their new casino. Anyone can do a "google" to find out what kind of filthy sleaze this family is, and comes from--- the violence and murder, the organized stealing and prostitution, the drug dealing and their "non-Native" casino operations recently were cited for the largest string of labor violations in U.S. history, and they were run out of Missouri after they tried to bribe none other than the state's Attorney General and other public officials.


I have in front of me right now, Tribal Court Orders from dozens of these casinos banning me from their premises for engaging in union organizing.


I have not been to all 350 casinos in the Indian Gaming Industry; I have been to about 15% of them and have yet to find one single Tribe that is sympathetic to unions in their casinos.

Same old anti-communist crap continues to ooze from the AFL-CIO

http://blog.aflcio.org/2010/11/21/report-the-real-story-behind-disney-toys-not-suited-for-children/

 

My response:

Alan L. Maki

I doubt this is true about the child labor--- the conditions do sound a lot like what workers are subjected to at Lillian Vernon, Wal-mart and in the Indian Gaming Industry. I find it very strange that the AFL-CIO makes up these stupid stories about China when your own "coalition partner," the Democratic Party, devised the "Compacts" creating the Indian Gaming Industry which now has some two-million Americans--- mostly young or very old and many people of color including thousands of "undocumented workers"--- employed in loud, noisy, smoke-filled casinos at poverty wages working for a bunch of violent mobsters like the Fertitta's where workers have no rights at all under state or federal labor laws... and not once have you mentioned any of this on your blog or anyplace else... but, you publish a "report" accusing China of allowing child labor without one single shred of proof.


I will tell you what... if the AFL-CIO will pay for the trip, and Richard Trumka will accompany me, I will arrange with Chinese officials to go with us to visit these plants in question to see what's going on--- if, upon our return, Richard Trumka will come with me to see what is going on in the Indian Gaming Industry.


China definitely has its problems; but, exploiting child labor is not one of them.


Say, have you ever seen the faces of child poverty on Indian Reservations right here in the United States?
I am sure Richard Trumka could have accompanied his buddy Barack Obama to India and seen real exploitation of child labor.


I notice you don't publish the child victims of Obama's dirty wars on your blog, either. How many Chinese troops and drones do you see killing children?


Alan L. Maki
Director of Organizing,
Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council

 

 

Note: Richard Trumka has failed to respond to my offer.

It’s nice to hear some military people telling us we can get the same bang for less cost--- BUT…

It is nice that some military people say they can do with less money and accomplish THE SAME OBJECTIVES; however, we aren't going to get very far if we buy into what they consider "defense." Once you buy into their argument of what "defense" consists of you buy into this worthless militarism requiring huge amounts of senseless military spending. We might better take our resources and just toss them into the ocean--- at least no one dies.

This country has no defense needs beyond our own borders; we don't even have any right saying we have to have our military anyplace else in the world. We have no right establishing a military budget based upon servicing and maintaining over 800 military operations and bases on foreign soil or waters not our own.

We have no neighbors posing any military threat to this country; nor would Canada or Mexico be capable of mounting any kind of military invasion against us even if they wanted to... but they don't want to and never will... these countries will be our friends forever... they are good neighbors (even though they must have to really bend at times to remain our friends).

"Terrorism" is being held up as the big threat to this country, now... no one, no matter how powerful their military is safe from terrorism... international cooperation based upon justice and respect for all peoples is the only defense against terrorism.

I don't think there is a country in the world where the populace is so well armed as in the United States... and, judging from the patriotic fervor we see in this country any country attempting to evade would be fools.

If we didn't produce a single new weapon in the next fifty years we would still have too many weapons of war.

All military production should be taken out of the hands of private corporations and production of weapons for our own safety and savings (and military profiteering) should take place in government enterprises--- take away the profits from so-called "defense spending" and this insane militaristic drive will end very rapidly. The merchants of death and destruction have no friends other than those come bearing cash.

A sane and just U.S. foreign policy which would end all arms shipments and military subsidies to Israel would eliminate the threat from Israel very quickly... in fact, Israel's leaders would sober up very fast and confront the reality that Palestinians are actually human beings who are entitled by birth like everyone to have the right to live with respect and dignity.

Apparently we have so many weapons already that we can't even store them so they are being "stored" in Israel.

This is not so much about "how much" we spend on the military as it is about what the military is for and what U.S. foreign policy is and should be. If we have a sane, sensible foreign policy based on justice where peace and respect for all peoples is the primary objective we can pretty much end all defense spending except that required to maintain a military right here within our own borders.

There is only one reason we have over 800 military bases and military operations dotting the globe; and that is to protect Wall Street's interests: cheap labor and cheap natural resources.

Why else would there be this horrible School of the Americas to train every two-bit, half-assed fascist dictator in the world to suppress and put down their own people?

Every single penny spent on war and militarism robs us of resources we need to solve our many social problems right here in the United States... sometimes I wonder what country (even what planet) some of these people are living on when they talk about spending billions and trillions of dollars on militarism, wars and subsequent occupations of countries.

Do they not understand the massive poverty we have in this country; the people forced to go without health care and child care as our infrastructure largely built up through New Deal programs crumbles?

Have these people never taken the time to ask: How is this war economy working for us?

Do they really not understand that militarism and wars kill jobs, just like these wars kill people?

Do they not understand that this militarism and wars impoverish us as a people and as a nation?

We need to initiate a full debate in this country as we go into the 2012 Elections and beyond--- a debate feared by both Republicans and Democrats: What should be the objective of American foreign policy? Does our security lie in weapons systems or does our security lie in justice for all peoples?

We have all heard the chant: No justice; no peace!

Well, either this is true, or it isn't. Why shout this chant at peace demonstrations if peace relies on military might and strength? If we are going to buy into the argument that we can get the same militarism and same wars and same occupations of countries for a cheaper price, why even bother talking about peace?

These military people are talking about saving money; but, are they talking about peace?

Alan L. Maki

Sunday, November 21, 2010

One picture worth thousands of words...


Is there something in this picture that liberals, progressives and the left might learn something from for our struggles today?

Finally; Paul Krugman questions Obama’s world outlook and determines he is a true conservative…

We all know Paul Krugman fronts for Hillary Clinton so it isn't that surprising Krugman has finally acknowledged the truth about Obama being a conservative. The real question is: What is taking the rest of the liberals, progressives and the left who continue backing Obama to come to this realization? Obama needs to be pushed out of the way--- his one/half term has already been way too long. We don't need Hillary... what we need is someone that is really a true voice of the historic coalition of liberals, progressives and the left that can bring about real progressive change. Where is George McGovern when we need him now?

 

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/21/fdr-reagan-and-obama/

 

Paul Krugman - New York Times Blog

November 21, 2010, 2:07 AM

FDR, Reagan, and Obama

Some readers may recall that back during the Democratic primary Barack Obama shocked many progressives by praising Ronald Reagan as someone who brought America a “sense of dynamism and entrepreneurship that had been missing.” I was among those who found this deeply troubling — because the idea that Reagan brought a transfomation in American dynamism is a right-wing myth, not borne out by the facts. (There was a surge in productivity and innovation — but it happened in the 90s, under Clinton, not under Reagan).

All the usual suspects pooh-poohed these concerns; it was ridiculous, they said, to think of Obama as a captive of right-wing mythology.

But are you so sure about that now?

And here’s this, from Thomas Ferguson: Obama saying

We didn’t actually, I think, do what Franklin Delano Roosevelt did, which was basically wait for six months until the thing had gotten so bad that it became an easier sell politically because we thought that was irresponsible. We had to act quickly.

As Ferguson explains, this is a right-wing smear. What actually happened was that during the interregnum between the 1932 election and the1933 inauguration — which was much longer then, because the inauguration didn’t take place until March — Herbert Hoover tried to rope FDR into maintaining his policies, including rigid adherence to the gold standard and fiscal austerity. FDR declined to be part of this.

But Obama buys the right-wing smear.

More and more, it’s becoming clear that progressives who had their hearts set on Obama were engaged in a huge act of self-delusion. Once you got past the soaring rhetoric you noticed, if you actually paid attention to what he said, that he largely accepted the conservative storyline, a view of the world, including a mythological history, that bears little resemblance to the facts.

And confronted with a situation utterly at odds with that storyline … he stayed with the myth.

Congressman Collin Peterson votes to fund these dirty wars… ships Minnesota jobs to China and then votes against extending benefits to the long-term unemployed who he robbed of jobs.

Minnesota's 7th Congressional District Representative Collin Peterson, a Democrat, voted AGAINST extending unemployment benefits to the long-term unemployed because of how much it will cost. Peterson, who boasts to the local media here that he is more conservative than any Republican, has never had a problem when it comes to voting for more money to fund these dirty wars. In fact, Peterson maneuvered to get his friends who own Mattracks and Pentagon contract and the company turned around and used the money to build a huge new plant in China. Peterson helped put Minnesotans in the unemployment lines and now he votes to deny his own unemployed constituents unemployment benefits. Mark Froemke, the AFL-CIO big-shot registered to vote in North Dakota, who nominated Collin Peterson has remained silent as has Shar Knutson, the President of the Minnesota AFL-CIO who boasted to union members just a few days ago that the money and support the AFL-CIO provided Peterson for his re-election was money well spent--- well, tell that to unemployed workers whose jobs in the defense industry Peterson sent to China as these unemployed workers struggle to heat their homes, keep a roof over their heads and food on the table. The Minnesota AFL-CIO talks about "Jobs, jobs, jobs" then supports Collin Peterson whose war economy is killing jobs... go figure.

Saturday, November 20, 2010

More on China…

Alan L. Maki

I don't see anything in the present Chinese policies that is bellicose or war-like... for a nation to go to war takes some doing on the part of the government in "pumping up" of its people for war. We would be seeing and hearing this in the Chinese media if it were going on. This question and the problems of Tibet that always come up is not the result of the modern-day government of China--- all kinds of feudal war-lords and "nobility" as well as all kinds of foreign countries have tried to dominate Tibet... it is safe to say, that if Tibet was not an autonomous region of China that the violent strife would be even worse as these different feudal factions of "nobility" war with one another much like our gangs do here.


What China could do and what China does do, I think, are two very important distinctions.


I talk to many Chinese people visiting the United States in various capacities... never do I hear any suggestion of any kind of bellicose belligerence towards the United States from any of the people. I read Chinese publications (English translations) very regularly and there are no war-like statements. Occasionally I watch the Chinese television network on cable--- there is nothing there suggesting any intent to want war with anyone. Is the Chinese Navy conducting military exercises with-in view of any of our beaches? No.


I am sure the Chinese are not pacifists; like a rattlesnake I am sure if provoked they will attack with a vengeance, why wouldn't they?


We have no more to fear from China than Mexico or Canada... neither of which treats their indigenous populations all that well... but, then again, life isn't a bowl of cherries for the indigenous populations of these countries and I don't hear many complaints from our elected officials calling for self-determination and their right to secede; how are things in Tibet compared to life on any Indian Reservation or ghetto or barrio in this country? I hear the calls for sovereignty from Indian Nations all across this country--- I wonder how it would be received if the Chinese used the same methods insisting for full sovereignty for Indian Nations as what our government demands from China regarding Tibet? I bet there would be no shortage of U.S. business people, mining and forestry companies who would just love to see a "free" Tibet ruled over by a small group of "noblemen" ordering their "free" people to work like slaves.


Yes, in addition to those countries you mention, the Chinese also came to the aid of the Koreans when the United States tried to impose capitalism through a fascist dictatorship on the Korean people who had just freed themselves from the Japanese.


And, the Red Army proved to be very good fighters--- on our side (when our side was the right side)--- in the war against Japan.


There is no question the Chinese Red Army can fight wars--- but, I don't see the Red Army of China in any other country any place in the world today--- except for in China. And there is nothing to suggest they will be attacking us or anyone else--- except for maybe some feudal lords of nobility in Tibet--- and then, only in response to their violence. I don't see the police in this country standing by while anarchist gangs have fun kicking out bank windows.

Some thoughts on China

Alan L. Maki

Les, I have passed your comments on to Sidney for his response since your comments are directed at his views which quite often differ from mine; although, with this letter he has sent out I tend to mostly agree with him... especially his concluding statement:


"The world is moving on two axes, and we should, in our own country, start fighting for change, prevent the impoverishment of the working people in this country, demand stopping the wars, use the money to build up industry, help them create jobs, and invest in high tech, These are the only ways they will turn around this particular economic crisis, which will develop into a deep depression if they do not do it.


We had better start shouting."


Personally, and I have told Sidney this, I think he is too hopeful that the Chinese leadership is doing the right things by the Chinese people... I would like to think this is the case but given what I see (which is from afar; I have never been to China--- but, I have discussed things with many Chinese people visiting this country and lower level Chinese "officials"), I find it very hard to agree that things are moving in the best of all directions... but, I do think that the one thing China has is a very peaceful foreign policy which excludes war as a means of solving international conflicts and problems.


As to how China resolves the problems with Tibet, this will probably be a while before this is resolved because of the sharp divisions within Tibet itself. Almost every country in the world has similar problems and it isn't helpful when another country is always trying to antagonize the situation as the United States has done as part of its foreign policy. It often seems to me that if the situation in Tibet was resolved to everyone's satisfaction the United States would be the least happy. We have seen the United States use religious, racial, national and ethnic tensions as a means of exerting control all over the world. The NSA and the CIA along with the Schools of the Americas specifically trains people to do just this. Here in the United States, the FBI has carried out this policy internally--- its COINTELPRO operations were a perfect example; and the revelations that came out in the joint FBI-CIA document that has come to be known as "The Family Jewels" explained all of this in minute detail.


To the extent that China has any policies that hurt us (these same policies in my opinion are also detrimental to Chinese working people); these policies are being implemented at the behest of Wall Street coupon clippers and the international financiers, investors, bankers and industrialists--- for the sake of securing maximum profits off their investments.


I don't know who actually "owns" this aircraft industry you are referring to... but, I am guessing that if you look into this "ownership" question you are going to find the same thing I found looking into who "owns" the rail industry in China that is producing locomotives and other rail components now being sold all over the world: General Electric is a major partner along with the huge Canadian multinational out of Quebec, Bombardier.


Your statement that there are 1,000 billionaires in China is very disconcerting, to say the least--- this represents tremendous wealth being stolen from the Chinese people. I was under the impression there were like maybe 50 or 60 billionaires in China and even that represents tremendous wealth. No wonder there is such poverty in China if your figures are accurate. And this doesn't even consider the swindles of George Soros and his bunch nor does it consider the stock and bond transactions taking place where tremendous wealth is leaving China--- wealth derived from cheap labor.


I was wondering why Bill Gates and Warren Buffett would bother going to China to discuss the need for "philanthropy" with China's billionaires... now this makes sense. Of course if there are so many billionaires one can only imagine how many millionaires there are in China. Obviously the Chinese people are going to have to figure out what they intend to do to prevent this hemorrhaging of their nation's wealth and the redistribution of wealth just like we now have to consider this since wealth in our country has been rapidly making its way to the top since the end of the Civil War (actually, the beginning of the Civil War where so much profit was made).


This uneven distribution of wealth in the hands of a few has the same results in China that it has here in the United States, Canada, Great Britain, France or any other country in the world... it places us on the road to ruin and perdition... no country can survive this kind of wealth in the hands of a very few any more than it can survive a war economy.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Austerity is wrong medicine for bleeding economy

Interesting article... Sam Webb, the head of the Communist Party USA is following the lead put forward by George Soros, the anti-communist Center for American Progress and The Century Foundation which works with The Council on Foreign Affairs... Webb has embraced the "economic populism" of the Democratic Party completely by not once mentioning the need to put an end to Obama's wars as a precondition for solving this economic mess we are in by putting people back to work... as suggested by his mentor, George Lakoff, Webb gushes out nice sounding "progressive policy directives" but not once does he bring forward a specific solution and then he embraces the same sell-out strategy used to destroy unity of liberal, left and progressive forces for real healthcare reform by mouthing meaningless words about the need to improve health care. According to Webb, deficits don't matter--- I wonder what banker is paying his salary? 

In fact,  deficits do matter because those deficits are repaid with big interest to the banks which means austerity for the working class... and, Webb starts out by correctly pointing out that "austerity is the wrong medicine."

Webb evades what kinds of jobs are needed to put people to work... he doesn't understand that the kind of jobs needed are putting people to work solving the problems of working people, the working class and the problems of society.

Webb evades the fact that a National Public Health Care System would create ten million new jobs. He refuses to insist on a National Public Child Care System which would create over 3,000,000 new jobs.

Most importantly though, Webb continues to evade the issue of the need to end these dirty imperialist wars--- he actually supports the war in Afghanistan and supports the U.S. occupation of Iraq... strange positions for a Communist to take.

Instead of asking the all important question: How is Obama's war economy working for you? He, like the Democrats, doesn't even mention these dirty imperialist wars that kill jobs just like they kill people.

Obviously Webb intends for this essay of his to be advice to Barack Obama... but, Obama will never read what Webb writes... neither will working people pay any attention to something like this from a Communist Party "leader" who doesn't bring forward solutions and evades exposing how the war economy is integral to unemployment and poverty.

Like Obama, Webb fails to call for the enforcement of affirmative action. Why? Because Webb is a racist.

Who cares about Webb's call for a coalition to "oppose the right" when what we need is a coalition to force Obama and the Democrats to do what is right; and this will defeat the right-wing.  

Alan L. Maki


 

Austerity is wrong medicine for bleeding economy


by: Sam Webb
 
November 17 2010
 
The labor movement has persuasively argued that the election's mandate was to create jobs and resolve the economic mess in the interests of working people. The election's mandate was not to make that mess worse. And yet, this is precisely what the Republican policies of draconian spending cuts would do. Nothing could be more harmful.
What is delaying an economic recovery is not too much spending and a growing deficit, but not enough federal spending.
The economy is stalled and spending is down. Consumers are up to their ears in debt and are understandably reluctant to use scarce dollars to buy things like refrigerators, cars, houses, or home improvements. And don't hold your breath waiting for the capitalist class, sitting on roughly two trillion dollars - yes, $2,000,000,000 - to invest its surplus cash in new hiring and productive capacity.
The crisis gripping the country and world is one of demand insufficiency. Thus to cut government spending for jobs, infrastructure, green technology, public education, and aid to local governments in these circumstances is like throwing fuel on a fire - things will get worse, maybe much worse, before they get better.
Nevertheless, the Republican right, if it has its way, is determined to take a meat axe to people's programs at the federal, state and local level. Government, it is said, has to live within its means like everyone else does.
But the truth is just the opposite. For the time being government has to live, not within, but beyond its means. Its immediate imperative is to put dollars in the hands of people who will spend those dollars, namely working and poor people, people of color, youth, and seniors. Nothing could be worse than for the government to tighten its belt in a period when the economy is slumping, unemployment is stuck in the double-digit range, investment in new plants and equipment is meager, and consumer demand is low.
That would be economic suicide. It could turn the warnings of a "double dip" of the economy into a reality.
The millions who went to the polls two weeks ago didn't cast their vote for policies that will drive the economy further downward.
Many were influenced by the toxic environment that was engineered by the right-wing media and corporations and, sorry to say, abetted by the inadequate responses of the Democratic Party to an avalanche of misinformation, demagogy and lies. But it is still a good bet that for millions change looks like a job at a livable wage, a moratorium on mortgage payments, an extension of unemployment insurance, tax breaks for everybody but the richest families and corporations, stiffer regulations on banks and bankers' pay, an expansion of public infrastructure projects, a health care plan that is affordable, universal and easy to understand, well-funded public schools, and retirement security.
Ask Americans feeling the pinch of this economic crisis if their priority - if they have to choose - is the list above or a balanced budget.
I strongly suspect it is the former, not the latter.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt drank the Kool-Aid of austerity in 1937 and as a result a steep price had to be paid - the economic recovery that was under way lost its steam, hardship grew, and the president and the New Dealers in Congress took a hit in the 1938 elections. Hopefully, this mistake will not be repeated today, because the results will be much the same, including in 2012.
The Republican right won a major victory in this month's midterm elections, but the Democrats and people's movement retain important bases of power.
2010 is not 1994. Obama is not Bill Clinton, who was quick to declare the "era of big government is over." The Senate remains in Democratic hands. The Progressive Caucus in the House is bigger and battle-tested. The coalition opposing the right is more united and more politically attuned. And the people reeling under the weight of a protracted downturn want relief first of all.
The economic policies of the Republican right are also full of contradictions and unsustainable.
The next two years are going to be a dogfight on the ground and in the corridors of political power. And, if the recent elections taught us anything it is that the battle over ideas cannot be underestimated. Right-wing extremism learned this lesson years ago. Our side of the class struggle has to learn and master it now.
To be successful everyone who desires a way out of the current crisis has to become a voice for reason, decency, fairness and economic justice. Simple logic tells us, and we should say it loud and clear: We were not at the switch when the economy unraveled, but we know who was - high finance and the same Republican voices who are now insisting that the government rein in spending for jobs and people's needs and walk away from a wounded and bleeding economy.
Photo: Budget cuts protest at San Francisco State University last year.